- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:07:22 +0000
- To: Johnny Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org>
- cc: "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CAEn92To2LmVGwqR1uqW_Z45w6ejjpHG8CfmOf6HPN6qnXv0+OQ@mail.gmail.com>, Johnny Graetting er writes: >I'm not that interested in talking about lightbulbs But the WG certainly is, it's in our charter to support non-browser APIs. >People mis-configure software all the time. This is a foot-gun. Ex, >consider an admin for a deployed service who "tunes" their load-balancer >configuration to require smaller frames because they heard that'd improve >latency. How is that different from him "tuning" anything else while being an idiot ? Specifically, how is it different from him doing the same idiotic thing to HTTP/1 today ? Please come up with a serious and detailed example where this will not just work out of the box ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 21:07:45 UTC