- From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:19:33 +1000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 01:20:02 UTC
On 21 July 2014 04:59, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Roy’s point below hasn’t been discussed in the context of HTTP/2 before > IIRC; he’s right in that the nature of expect/continue in HTTP/1 is not > just hop-by-hop. > > Given that, it sounds like we need to address this issue (e.g., using > Julian’s patch), and also adjust our existing text about 100-continue (and > perhaps even about 101). > The commit that Martin has just made to close #535 says: HTTP/2 removes support for the two 1xx series status codes defined in <xref target="RFC7231" x:fmt="," x:rel="#status.1xx"/>): 100 (Continue), and 101 (Switching Protocols) Is this a work in progress? I took the meaning of Marks email was that h2 would continue to support 100 and even maybe 101? cheers -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 01:20:02 UTC