- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 14:50:20 -0700
- To: "Kulkarni, Saurabh" <sakulkar@akamai.com>
- Cc: "Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)" <robby.simpson@ge.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 7 August 2014 14:27, Kulkarni, Saurabh <sakulkar@akamai.com> wrote: > Since now we have switched the static table to the lower indices, we > should try to see if we can populate the entries if possible with their > most-popular values. For e.g. Œcontent-encoding: gzip¹ is better than > Œcontent-encoding: <empty>¹. Having an empty value made sense when we > always added entries to header table before, but now it just seems like we > are missing an opportunity to further get some compression thru populating > all the headers. I just went through the list; there really isn't much that we can add that is unambiguously good like that. Content-Encoding seems like the only good example. Cache-Control: no-cache too. But see previous comments regarding changes.
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2014 21:50:47 UTC