Re: consensus on :query ?

In message <>, Julian Reschke writes:
>On 2014-07-21 15:37, Martin Thomson wrote:
>> On 21 July 2014 06:29, Julian Reschke <> wrote:
>>> ...again, if we do things like that please do not couple it with "?". Just
>>> have two parts that get concatenated verbatim to reconstruct the full
>>> path+query.
>> I don't know how to act on that.  Are you suggesting that a 1.1 to 2
>> gateway would be unable to perform any separation?
>No. It's about the fact that making a privacy-related decision based on 
>what's in the path and what's in the query is misguided.

Uhm, the primary argument is compression ratio.

Privacy will only be relevant if we go further in HTTP/3.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 14:32:53 UTC