Re: Getting it out the door. Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched


If we are talking trivial changes to implement like switching this
back or mucking with static table or huffman codes, I don't mind. They
are easy to knock out vs rearranging frames, op-codes, lengths, etc.


On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Greg Wilkins <> wrote:
> On 28 September 2014 03:52, Mark Nottingham <> wrote:
>> I think the time for that has truly past; most of our implementers want to
>> get this out the door and running, not do another round of R&D.
> Just for the record, as an implementer I want neither to just get it out the
> door, nor to do another round of R&D.
> I do not believe that the flaws in the protocol can be resolved by simply
> iterating the process that we are in.    If there was interest in reviewing
> the charter, collecting more public data to work against  and taking a step
> back to truly reviewing what has been produced.... then I'd be all for that
> regardless of the time it would take or the pie on our faces.
> Failing that, I'm inclined to not change too much in the current draft - but
> if good data is presented to indicate the value of minor changes (eg
> switching dynamic/static table, adding values to static table entries,
> huffman recoding etc etc.) then I'm happy to follow the data.... at least
> for one more round.
> regards
> --
> Greg Wilkins <>
> HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
>  advice and support for jetty and cometd.

Received on Sunday, 28 September 2014 22:09:35 UTC