Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535)

On 2014-07-17 14:55, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <>, Julian Reschke writes:
>> On 2014-07-17 14:44, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> The concrete proposal is to handle 1xx messages in HTTP/2 exactly the
>> same way as in HTTP/1.1. HTTP/2 will need code (and specification) to
>> deal with 1xx one way or another, and I believe my proposal has the
>> property of being both simple and consistent with 1.1.
> And as I said:  I think that's a bad idea.
> We can do 100 better, don't need 101 and we have no idea how any
> future 1xx codes might or might not work anyway.

The last part doesn't make any sense.

My proposal is to treat them *exactly* as in 1.1.

What exactly do you mean by "might or might not work"?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 13:09:11 UTC