- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:08:36 +0200
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-07-17 14:55, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <53C7C6C6.4030407@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: >> On 2014-07-17 14:44, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> The concrete proposal is to handle 1xx messages in HTTP/2 exactly the >> same way as in HTTP/1.1. HTTP/2 will need code (and specification) to >> deal with 1xx one way or another, and I believe my proposal has the >> property of being both simple and consistent with 1.1. > > And as I said: I think that's a bad idea. > > We can do 100 better, don't need 101 and we have no idea how any > future 1xx codes might or might not work anyway. The last part doesn't make any sense. My proposal is to treat them *exactly* as in 1.1. What exactly do you mean by "might or might not work"? Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 13:09:11 UTC