Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed Standard

On 7/27/14, 10:40 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> In Toronto, we discussed moving RFC7238 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7238> from Experimental to Proposed Standard, now that it is implemented in most browsers.
>
> The WG in the room seemed to think that doing so is a good idea; anyone here have a reason to believe otherwise?
>
> See also:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-http-status-code-308-ps/

+1

     Tony Hansen

Received on Monday, 28 July 2014 13:43:49 UTC