W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: h2 use of Upgrade

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:18:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX63Ks3G=P3hj+sUHLAT3ZmK9yO9b7e+H4zcJ0DaBaDqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 31 August 2014 20:16, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
> Note that the SETTINGS frame is a sufficient response if the request
> was for OPTIONS.

Are you suggesting that we wouldn't provide an HTTP-level response
(other than the 101) to the OPTIONS request?
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 22:19:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 9 September 2019 17:48:20 UTC