- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:18:48 -0700
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 31 August 2014 20:16, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: > Note that the SETTINGS frame is a sufficient response if the request > was for OPTIONS. Are you suggesting that we wouldn't provide an HTTP-level response (other than the 101) to the OPTIONS request?
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 22:19:16 UTC