W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:18:49 +0000
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <75853.1405415929@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CAH_y2NFTWTP4DMaxCNYs1JqOCM8V+iwS7KZOui7Vua+bNMvgbg@mail.gmail.com>, Greg Wilkins wri

>I'd like to see 100 semantic supported in h2, 

But isn't it already supported via the per-stream windows ?

It's true that the sender can fill the initial per stream window
before the receiver has a chance to decide if it wants the body
or not, but I've never seen the 100-Continue as a mechanism to
avoid sending a few unwanted tens of kilobyts, but rather to avoid
sending unwanted mega- and gigabytes ?

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 09:19:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC