Saturday, 30 March 2013
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- Re: Clipboard API: Stripping script element
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
Friday, 29 March 2013
- Re: Clipboard API: Stripping script element
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- [IME] Preparing some feedback
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- [Bug 21434] New: Need to spec liveness of Gamepad objects
Thursday, 28 March 2013
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: Clipboard API: Stripping script element
- Re: [webcomponents] Adjusting offsetParent, offsetTop, offsetLeft properties in Shadow DOM
- Re: [webcomponents] Adjusting offsetParent, offsetTop, offsetLeft properties in Shadow DOM
- Re: [webcomponents] Adjusting offsetParent, offsetTop, offsetLeft properties in Shadow DOM
- Re: [webcomponents] Adjusting offsetParent, offsetTop, offsetLeft properties in Shadow DOM
- Re: [webcomponents] Adjusting offsetParent, offsetTop, offsetLeft properties in Shadow DOM
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents] writing some pages that use webcomponents, and blogging along the way
- Re: DOM: Futures
- DOM: Futures
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- Re: Clipboard API: Stripping script element
- Re: Clipboard API: Stripping script element
- Re: Re: Clipboard API: Stripping script element
- Re: Clipboard API: Stripping script element
- Re: Clipboard API: Stripping script element
- Re: File API for Review
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
Wednesday, 27 March 2013
- Re: [webcomponents] writing some pages that use webcomponents, and blogging along the way
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents] style hooks for custom elements
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: File API for Review
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents] Adjusting offsetParent, offsetTop, offsetLeft properties in Shadow DOM
- Re: [webcomponents] Adjusting offsetParent, offsetTop, offsetLeft properties in Shadow DOM
- Re: [webcomponents] style hooks for custom elements
- Re: [webcomponents] style hooks for custom elements
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- [webcomponents] style hooks for custom elements
- RfC: 2nd LCWD of HTML Media Capture; deadline 19 April
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- Re: File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
Tuesday, 26 March 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: What is your plan for the Fullscreen spec of WebApps and CSSWG?
- File API: why is there same-origin restriction on blob URLs?
- Re: What is your plan for the Fullscreen spec of WebApps and CSSWG?
- Re: What is your plan for the Fullscreen spec of WebApps and CSSWG?
- What is your plan for the Fullscreen spec of WebApps and CSSWG?
- [webcomponents] writing some pages that use webcomponents, and blogging along the way
- [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Reminder: [admin] Registration for 25-26 April 2013 f2f meeting open; deadline April 5
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
Monday, 25 March 2013
Tuesday, 26 March 2013
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: window.event and Event.srcElement
- Re: window.event and Event.srcElement
- [Bug 21392] FileReader does not specify behavior on invalid input
Monday, 25 March 2013
- [Bug 21392] New: FileReader does not specify behavior on invalid input
- Re: window.event and Event.srcElement
- Re: window.event and Event.srcElement
- Re: window.event and Event.srcElement
- Re: window.event and Event.srcElement
- [webcomponents]: Naming the Baby
- Re: window.event and Event.srcElement
- Re: window.event and Event.srcElement
- Re: File API for Review
- Re: File API for Review
- Re: window.event and Event.srcElement
- Re: window.event and Event.srcElement
- window.event and Event.srcElement
- [Bug 21388] New: handling of analog vs. digital buttons
- Re: File API for Review
- [Bug 21387] New: Need to spec better support for control mapping
- [Bug 21386] New: Should specify how to present d-pads/triggers as buttons
- Re: [webcomponents] Adjusting offsetParent, offsetTop, offsetLeft properties in Shadow DOM
- [Bug 17311] The dictionary for GamepadEvent's ctor isn't defined
Sunday, 24 March 2013
- Re: [webcomponents] Adjusting offsetParent, offsetTop, offsetLeft properties in Shadow DOM
- SV: fixing appcache...
- Re: [webcomponents] Adjusting offsetParent, offsetTop, offsetLeft properties in Shadow DOM
- Re: [webcomponents] insertion points and offsetParent
- Re: [webcomponents]: Invocation order of custom element readyCallback
- fixing appcache...
Saturday, 23 March 2013
Friday, 22 March 2013
- [Bug 17310] The target of gamepad(dis)connected events is not defined
- [Bug 21321] Add event constructor and *EventInit dictionary for GamePadEvent
- Re: [webcomponents]: Invocation order of custom element readyCallback
- [Bug 17743] When setting designMode to 'on', the selection should be moved to an empty selection at the start of body (or something like that). If there isn't a body yet, wait until there is. Don't do this for contenteditable.
- Re: [webcomponents]: Invocation order of custom element readyCallback
- Re: [webcomponents]: Invocation order of custom element readyCallback
- Re: Web Intents/Web Activities F2F get-together report
- [Bug 21320] The spec doesn't define where the events should be dispatched
- [Bug 17306] The initial value of timestamp is not defined
- [Bug 21322] The definition of timestamp is unclear
- Re: [webcomponents]: Invocation order of custom element readyCallback
- [Bug 21323] Gamepad should have a connected attribute
- [webcomponents]: Invocation order of custom element readyCallback
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Re: CfC: publish WD of Input Editor Method (IME) API; deadline March 28
Thursday, 21 March 2013
- [Bug 18289] Support 'column' here for consistency with window.onerror?
- RE: publish WD of Input Editor Method (IME) API; deadline March 28
- CfC: publish WD of Input Editor Method (IME) API; deadline March 28
Wednesday, 20 March 2013
- Re: [webcomponents] calling JS on custom element construction
- Re: [webcomponents] calling JS on custom element construction
- [webcomponents] calling JS on custom element construction
- Re: CfC: publish WD of Clipboard API and events; deadline March 26
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: CfC: publish WD of Clipboard API and events; deadline March 26
- Re: CfC: publish WD of Clipboard API and events; deadline March 26
Tuesday, 19 March 2013
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- CfC: publish WD of Clipboard API and events; deadline March 26
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: File API for Review
- Re: Update of the IME API spec working draft [call for comments]
- Update of the IME API spec working draft [call for comments]
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- [Bug 11797] Declarative way to get formatting UI for contenteditable="" (as in <video controls=""> but for text editing)
Monday, 18 March 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: Pointer lock updated with clarification of lock and focus requirements.
- Re: [webcomponents]: Moving custom element callbacks to prototype/instance
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Re: CfC: move WebApps' test suites to Github; deadline March 22
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: CfC: move WebApps' test suites to Github; deadline March 22
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- [Bug 21323] New: Gamepad should have a connected attribute
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- [Bug 21322] New: The definition of timestamp is unclear
- [Bug 21321] New: Add event constructor and *EventInit dictionary for GamePadEvent
- [Bug 21320] New: The spec doesn't define where the events should be dispatched
- Re: Monkeypatching document.createElement() is wrong
- Re: Monkeypatching document.createElement() is wrong
- Re: [editing] defaultParagraphSeparator
- Re: [editing] defaultParagraphSeparator
Friday, 15 March 2013
Monday, 18 March 2013
- [webcomponents] Adjusting offsetParent, offsetTop, offsetLeft properties in Shadow DOM
- [Bug 21318] New: anon flag should be anonymous
Sunday, 17 March 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Re: CfC: move WebApps' test suites to Github; deadline March 22
Saturday, 16 March 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Re: [webcomponents] linking using <link rel="components" href="...">?
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: Pointer lock updated with clarification of lock and focus requirements.
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing connection in a versionchange transaction
- Re: [IndexedDB] Attributes with undefined vs. null
- Re: [IndexedDB] better way of deleting records
- [Bug 17681] [IndexedDB] Operations that raise multiple exceptions types should define order
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
Friday, 15 March 2013
- Pointer lock updated with clarification of lock and focus requirements.
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- [editing] table manipulation commands
- Re: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- WebSocket API - server initiated close
- CfC: move WebApps' test suites to Github; deadline March 22
- RE: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- [webcomponents] linking using <link rel="components" href="...">?
- WebSocket API - server initiated close
- [FileAPI]
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- Re: RfR: Web Workers Test Cases; deadline March 28
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Re: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
Thursday, 14 March 2013
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: [shadow-dom] Counters and list item counting
- RE: [shadow-dom] Counters and list item counting
- RfR: Web Workers Test Cases; deadline March 28
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: Node.baseURI and Fragment Identifiers
- Re: Node.baseURI and Fragment Identifiers
- Re: Node.baseURI and Fragment Identifiers
- Re: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- Re: Node.baseURI and Fragment Identifiers
- Node.baseURI and Fragment Identifiers
- RE: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Re: <link rel=component>: force utf-8
Wednesday, 13 March 2013
- Re: <link rel=component>: force utf-8
- <link rel=component>: force utf-8
- Re: File API for Review
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- [Bug 16834] FileList in input.files (multiple attribute)
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- [Bug 21264] New: referrer source is wrong
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Sandbox with intents
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
Tuesday, 12 March 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
Monday, 11 March 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- [webcomponents]: Making <link rel="components"> produce DocumentFragments
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [shadow-dom] Counters and list item counting
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: Moving Clipboard API spec forward
- [Bug 16834] FileList in input.files (multiple attribute)
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: [shadow-dom] Counters and list item counting
- Re: Streams and Blobs
Saturday, 9 March 2013
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- Re: Persistent Storage vs. Database
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Persistent Storage vs. Database
Friday, 8 March 2013
- security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: Persistent Storage vs. Database
- Re: [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- Re: The .shadowRoot property and WebComponents
- Re: Persistent Storage vs. Database
- Re: [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- Re: [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- Re: [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- The .shadowRoot property and WebComponents
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- Re: [webcomponents]: Custom element constructors are pinocchios
- Re: [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Custom element constructors are pinocchios
- Re: [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- Re: [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- Re: Persistent Storage vs. Database
- [webcomponents]: Custom element constructors are pinocchios
- Re: Web Storage's Normative References and PR / REC
Thursday, 7 March 2013
Friday, 8 March 2013
- Re: Persistent Storage vs. Database
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: The need to re-subscribe to requestAnimationFrame
- Re: The need to re-subscribe to requestAnimationFrame
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: IndexedDB: IDBOpenDBRequest sequencing
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: Web Storage's Normative References and PR / REC
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- Re: [webcomponents]: Moving custom element callbacks to prototype/instance
- Re: [webcomponents]: Moving custom element callbacks to prototype/instance
- Re: [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- [admin] Yves Lafon replaces Doug Schepers as Team Contact
- Re: File API for Review
- Re: File API for Review
- Re: File API for Review
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- Re: Persistent Storage vs. Database
- Persistent Storage vs. Database
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: File API: Blob.type
Thursday, 7 March 2013
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec
- [webcomponents]: HTMLElementElement missing a primitive
- Re: File API for Review
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: Web Storage's Normative References and PR / REC
- Re: Web Storage's Normative References and PR / REC
- Re: Web Storage's Normative References and PR / REC
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: Web Storage's Normative References and PR / REC
- Web Storage's Normative References and PR / REC
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: [shadow-dom] Counters and list item counting
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Moving custom element callbacks to prototype/instance
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: [webcomponents]: Moving custom element callbacks to prototype/instance
- Re: [webcomponents]: Moving custom element callbacks to prototype/instance
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Moving custom element callbacks to prototype/instance
- Re: [webcomponents]: Moving custom element callbacks to prototype/instance
Wednesday, 6 March 2013
- [webcomponents] Relaxing @host to be more useful
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Moving custom element callbacks to prototype/instance
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Moving custom element callbacks to prototype/instance
- Re: [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- [webcomponents]: What callbacks do custom elements need?
- [webcomponents]: Moving custom element callbacks to prototype/instance
- [Bug 20302] Document.execCommand should use optional arguments with default values
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- File API: Blob.type
- Paginated views, print preview and printing.
Monday, 4 March 2013
- [Bug 15684] [URL] Replacing backslash with forward slash in URIs doesn't seem to be necessitated by web compat
- [Bug 21147] WebSocket API could provide a method to get the HTTP response code when it's not 101
- Feb 2013 edition of "Standards for Web Applications on Mobile: current state and roadmap
Saturday, 2 March 2013
- Re: The need to re-subscribe to requestAnimationFrame
- Re: The need to re-subscribe to requestAnimationFrame
- Re: The need to re-subscribe to requestAnimationFrame
- Re: The need to re-subscribe to requestAnimationFrame
- Re: The need to re-subscribe to requestAnimationFrame
- The need to re-subscribe to requestAnimationFrame
Friday, 1 March 2013
- [Bug 17649] Address WebIDL comments from Kyle Huey and Ms2ger
- [Bug 18809] Some examples in the index section (3.3.4) have errors
- [Bug 18502] [IndexedDB] Editorial: Wording around IDBFactory.open() with no version misleading
- [Bug 16653] IndexedDB: Define overloads for IDBDatabase.transaction()
- [Bug 20394] [IndexedDB] Spec should use WebIDL concepts such as sequence<T> rather than Array
- [Bug 20582] Definitions of "valid key" and key comparison are underdefined and not compatible with WebIDL
- [Bug 19450] [IndexedDB] Key path segments should permit reserved words
Thursday, 28 February 2013
- [Bug 16513] Use WebIDL enum for IDBDatabase.transaction's mode argument
- Re: [admin] Towards XHR "The Attorney's Edition"
- Request for Review: Test cases for Web Messaging; deadline March 28
- [Bug 21147] WebSocket API could provide a method to get the HTTP response code when it's not 101
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- [admin] Towards XHR "The Attorney's Edition"
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- RE: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
Wednesday, 27 February 2013
- [admin] Registration for 25-26 April 2013 f2f meeting open; deadline April 5
- Face to face meeting registration
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Storage; deadline March 6
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: IndexedDB: IDBOpenDBRequest sequencing
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: IndexedDB: IDBOpenDBRequest sequencing
Tuesday, 26 February 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: Moving Clipboard API spec forward
- Re: Streams and Blobs
- Re: [editing] defaultParagraphSeparator
- Re: [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
- Streams and Blobs
- Re: [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
Monday, 25 February 2013
- Re: [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
- [Bug 21111] New: response property should return incremental data for ArrayBuffer and Blob
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: IndexedDB: IDBOpenDBRequest sequencing
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
- Re: [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
- Re: [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
- Re: [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
- RE: [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
Wednesday, 20 February 2013
Thursday, 21 February 2013
Friday, 22 February 2013
Sunday, 24 February 2013
- Re: Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Re: [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
- Re: Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Re: [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
- [XHR] remove "user cancels request"
Friday, 22 February 2013
Thursday, 21 February 2013
- RE: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
- Selectors API Level 1 is a W3C Recommendation
- Re: [webcomponents]: Building HTML elements with custom elements
- Re: indexeddb and object store events
- Re: [webcomponents]: Building HTML elements with custom elements
- Re: [webcomponents]: Custom elements no longer automagically create shadow trees
- [webcomponents]: Custom elements no longer automagically create shadow trees
Wednesday, 20 February 2013
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Building HTML elements with custom elements
- Re: [editing] defaultParagraphSeparator
- Re: [webcomponents]: Building HTML elements with custom elements
- Re: [webcomponents]: Building HTML elements with custom elements
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- [webcomponents]: Custom HTML elements
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- RE: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Building HTML elements with custom elements
- Re: [webcomponents]: Building HTML elements with custom elements
- [Bug 20833] Incomplete sentence in draft WD-IndexedDB-20120524
- [Bug 18656] objectStore.delete should raise InvalidStateError if object store is deleted
- [Bug 18558] [IndexedDB] Define error seen when key generator maximum value is reached
Tuesday, 19 February 2013
- [webcomponents]: Building HTML elements with custom elements
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: [shadow-dom] Counters and list item counting
- Re: [shadow-dom] Counters and list item counting
- Re: [shadow-dom] Counters and list item counting
- Re: [shadow-dom] Counters and list item counting
- Re: [shadow-dom] Counters and list item counting
- Re: [xhr] Appending a charset after an author added content-type
- [shadow-dom] Counters and list item counting
- Re: [xhr] Appending a charset after an author added content-type
- Re: [xhr] Appending a charset after an author added content-type
- Re: [xhr] Appending a charset after an author added content-type
- Re: [xhr] Appending a charset after an author added content-type
- [xhr] Appending a charset after an author added content-type
- Re: FYI: JSON mailing list and BoF
- Re: FYI: JSON mailing list and BoF
- [Bug 17046] Implement redirect audit functionality for XHR
- Re: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
- Re: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
- Re: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
- RE: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
- Re: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
- Re: FYI: JSON mailing list and BoF
- RE: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
- RE: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
- [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
- FYI: JSON mailing list and BoF
Monday, 18 February 2013
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- [Bug 19470] Event firing sequence on abort() after send()
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: Beacon API
Sunday, 17 February 2013
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: indexeddb and object store events
- Away for a month
- indexeddb and object store events
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
Saturday, 16 February 2013
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- RE: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
Friday, 15 February 2013
- RE: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: [XHR] withCredentials and HTTP authentication
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Beacon API
Thursday, 14 February 2013
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Re: Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- Custom elements ES6/ES5 syntax compromise, was: document.register and ES6
- FYI: Possible RFC 6455 (WebSocket) throttling erratum
- [admin] Editors: check the URL scheme of your stylesheets
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
Wednesday, 13 February 2013
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: Beacon API
- Re: File API for Review
- Re: File API for Review
- Beacon API
- Re: [shadow-dom] Event Retargeting
- Re: File API for Review
Tuesday, 12 February 2013
- Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
- Re: [XHR] withCredentials and HTTP authentication
- Re: [XHR] withCredentials and HTTP authentication
- Re: [XHR] withCredentials and HTTP authentication
- Re: [XHR] withCredentials and HTTP authentication
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: Monkeypatching document.createElement() is wrong
- Re: [shadow-dom] Event Retargeting
- Re: Monkeypatching document.createElement() is wrong
- Re: Monkeypatching document.createElement() is wrong
- Re: DRM nonsense in HTML
- Re: DRM nonsense in HTML
- DRM nonsense in HTML
- [shadow-dom] Event Retargeting
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: Monkeypatching document.createElement() is wrong
- Monkeypatching document.createElement() is wrong
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: [XHR] withCredentials and HTTP authentication
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: document.register and ES6
- [XHR] withCredentials and HTTP authentication
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling the shadow based on the host element
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling the shadow based on the host element
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling the shadow based on the host element
- Re: HTML5 web messaging - postMessage
Monday, 11 February 2013
- Re: [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- [webcomponents] Making the shadow root an Element
- Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
- [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
- [webcomponents] Styling the shadow based on the host element
- Re: Updated idlharness.js
- Fwd: [Bug 20945] New: Specs in dvcs have mixed-content stylesheets
Saturday, 9 February 2013
Friday, 8 February 2013
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- RE: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: Broken Links
Thursday, 7 February 2013
Friday, 8 February 2013
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- RE: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
Thursday, 7 February 2013
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- [Bug 17681] [IndexedDB] Operations that raise multiple exceptions types should define order
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: Shadow DOM: events that are stopped
- Re: Shadow DOM: events that are stopped
- Re: Shadow DOM: events that are stopped
- Fwd: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?
- Re: Shadow DOM: events that are stopped
- Re: [admin] Call for Agenda topics for April 25-26 f2f meeting
- [admin] Call for Agenda topics for April 25-26 f2f meeting
- Re: Shadow DOM: events that are stopped
- Re: Shadow DOM: events that are stopped
- Re: Shadow DOM: events that are stopped
- Shadow DOM: events that are stopped
Wednesday, 6 February 2013
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- File API for Review
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: Please add constructors for File and FileList
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: Please add constructors for File and FileList
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- [Bug 20887] New: Add a File constructor
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
Tuesday, 5 February 2013
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: IndexedDB events for object storage add, put and delete
- Re: document.register and ES6
- Re: IndexedDB events for object storage add, put and delete
- Re: IndexedDB events for object storage add, put and delete
- document.register and ES6
- Re: IndexedDB events for object storage add, put and delete
- Re: IndexedDB events for object storage add, put and delete
- Re: IndexedDB events for object storage add, put and delete
- IndexedDB events for object storage add, put and delete
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- RE: [editing] defaultParagraphSeparator
Monday, 4 February 2013
- Re: [editing] defaultParagraphSeparator
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- [editing] defaultParagraphSeparator
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: [admin] If you use `respec`, your ED may be broken
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
Saturday, 2 February 2013
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
Friday, 1 February 2013
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Re: Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- RE: Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Inviting your review of IndieUI Events
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Using Shadow DOM @host rule with :scope pseudo-selector
- Re: Using Shadow DOM @host rule with :scope pseudo-selector
- Using Shadow DOM @host rule with :scope pseudo-selector
Thursday, 31 January 2013
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- [Bug 18427] [IndexedDB] Spec text requires index names be unique within database
- [Bug 18328] [IndexedDB] Editorial: Clarify that "record value" === "referenced primary key" for indeces
- [Bug 17645] Define more precisely what the "origin" of the IDBEnvironment is
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Allow ... centralized dialog up front
- Re: Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Re: Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- [Bug 20833] New: Incomplete sentence in draft WD-IndexedDB-20120524
- Re: [admin] If you use `respec`, your ED may be broken
Wednesday, 30 January 2013
- Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- [Bug 18045] Based on my experience and from reading many questions on the Web, this API is seriously flawed. It treats cross-domain iframes the same as same-domain iframes, except that almost every operation on contentWindow is an error.
- Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Re: [admin] If you use `respec`, your ED may be broken
- Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Re: Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
- Keyboard events for accessible RIAs and Games
Tuesday, 29 January 2013
- [admin] Some tips on using Mercurial and dvcs.w3.org
- Re: [File API] About Partial Blob Data, XHR and Streams API
Monday, 28 January 2013
- Re: [IndexedDB] How to recover data from IndexedDB if the origin domain don't exist anymore?
- Re: [whatwg] HTML5 web messaging - postMessage
- Re: [whatwg] HTML5 web messaging - postMessage
- Re: [whatwg] HTML5 web messaging - postMessage
- Re: HTML5 web messaging - postMessage
- Re: HTML5 web messaging - postMessage
- RE: HTML5 web messaging - postMessage
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Streams API; deadline February 2
- HTML5 web messaging - postMessage
- Re: HTML5 web messaging - postMessage
Sunday, 27 January 2013
- [Bug 20788] New: myExecCommand('indent') on LI results in a tree with incorrect nesting
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- CfC: publish FPWD of Streams API; deadline February 2
Saturday, 26 January 2013
Friday, 25 January 2013
- [Bug 16596] Clarify how upgradeneeded works in the .open function
- Re: [fullscreen-api] Allowing AJAX requests when in fullscreen mode
- Re: [admin] If you use `respec`, your ED may be broken
- Re: [admin] If you use `respec`, your ED may be broken
- [admin] If you use `respec`, your ED may be broken
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
Thursday, 24 January 2013
- RfC: LCWD of Touch Events v1; comment deadline February 14
- Re: [fullscreen-api] Allowing AJAX requests when in fullscreen mode
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Review of the <template> spec
- RE: publish FPWD of HTML Templates; deadline January 31
- Re: [fullscreen-api] Allowing AJAX requests when in fullscreen mode
- Re: Updated idlharness.js
- Re: Updated idlharness.js
- Re: [fullscreen-api] Allowing AJAX requests when in fullscreen mode
- Re: [fullscreen-api] Allowing AJAX requests when in fullscreen mode
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback ( LC-2736)
- CfC: publish FPWD of HTML Templates; deadline January 31
- Re: Updated idlharness.js
- Re: [fullscreen-api] Allowing AJAX requests when in fullscreen mode
- Re: [fullscreen-api] Allowing AJAX requests when in fullscreen mode
Wednesday, 23 January 2013
- Tracking test suite status in PubStatus
- Re: Updated idlharness.js
- Updated idlharness.js
- Re: [fullscreen-api] Allowing AJAX requests when in fullscreen mode
- Re: [fullscreen-api] Allowing AJAX requests when in fullscreen mode
- RE: Declarative invocation and progressing Web Intents
- Re: [fullscreen-api] Allowing AJAX requests when in fullscreen mode
- [fullscreen-api] Allowing AJAX requests when in fullscreen mode
- RE: Declarative invocation and progressing Web Intents
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- [Bug 19752] Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
- [Bug 19773] Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- [Bug 19752] Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
Tuesday, 22 January 2013
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Declarative invocation and progressing Web Intents
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange should have static functions
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: [File API] About Partial Blob Data, XHR and Streams API
- Re: [File API] About Partial Blob Data, XHR and Streams API
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
- Proposal: moving tests to GitHub
Monday, 21 January 2013
- [IndexedDB] Type of IDBCursor.source
- [IndexedDB] Type of IDBRequest.readyState
- [IndexedDB] Type of IDBRequest.source
- [IndexedDB] Event handlers
- [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange should have static functions
Sunday, 20 January 2013
- Re: RfR: Progress Events Test Cases; deadline January 28
- Re: RfR: Progress Events Test Cases; deadline January 28
Saturday, 19 January 2013
- Re: RfR: Progress Events Test Cases; deadline January 28
- Re: RfR: Progress Events Test Cases; deadline January 28
- Re: RfR: Progress Events Test Cases; deadline January 28
Friday, 18 January 2013
- RfR: Progress Events Test Cases; deadline January 28
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [File API] About Partial Blob Data, XHR and Streams API
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [File API] About Partial Blob Data
- RE: [Streams API] typo
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback ( LC-2736)
Thursday, 17 January 2013
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback ( LC-2736)
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback ( LC-2736)
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback ( LC-2736)
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback ( LC-2736)
- [File API] About Partial Blob Data
- [Streams API] typo
Wednesday, 16 January 2013
- [IndexedDB] How to recover data from IndexedDB if the origin domain don't exist anymore?
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- Re: [IndexedDB] How to recover data from IndexedDB if the origin domain don't exist anymore?
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- Re: [IndexedDB] How to recover data from IndexedDB if the origin domain don't exist anymore?
- [IndexedDB] better way of deleting records
Tuesday, 15 January 2013
Monday, 14 January 2013
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- Re: Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
- Reading image bytes to a PNG in a typed array
Saturday, 12 January 2013
Thursday, 10 January 2013
- Re: IndexedDB: IDBOpenDBRequest sequencing
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [shadow-dom] text-decoration
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- RE: Digital Books, Web Components, Bookmarking and Hyperlinking
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Digital Books, Web Components, Bookmarking and Hyperlinking
Wednesday, 9 January 2013
- Re: [IndexedDB] How to recover data from IndexedDB if the origin domain don't exist anymore?
- RE: [IndexedDB] How to recover data from IndexedDB if the origin domain don't exist anymore?
- Re: [IndexedDB] How to recover data from IndexedDB if the origin domain don't exist anymore?
Tuesday, 8 January 2013
- Re: [IndexedDB] How to recover data from IndexedDB if the origin domain don't exist anymore?
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: [IndexedDB] How to recover data from IndexedDB if the origin domain don't exist anymore?
- [IndexedDB] How to recover data from IndexedDB if the origin domain don't exist anymore?
Monday, 7 January 2013
- [IME API] Our plan to move the spec forward in light of our F2F discussion
- RE: [IndexedDB] Straw man proposal for moving spec along TR track
- [Bug 20582] New: Definitions of "valid key" and key comparison are underdefined and not compatible with WebIDL
Sunday, 6 January 2013
Saturday, 5 January 2013
- Re: File Save As
- Re: File Save As
- Re: [web-components] Typos
- Re: File Save As
- File Save As
- Re: [IndexedDB] Straw man proposal for moving spec along TR track
Friday, 4 January 2013
- RE: [IndexedDB] Straw man proposal for moving spec along TR track
- Re: Pointer Lock status. Was: pointerLock vendor prefixes, shims and usability
- Pointer Lock status. Was: pointerLock vendor prefixes, shims and usability
- [Bug 19773] Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
- [Bug 19752] Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
- [Bug 18647] Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
- Re: pointerLock vendor prefixes, shims and usability
- Re: pointerLock vendor prefixes, shims and usability
- Re: [IndexedDB] Straw man proposal for moving spec along TR track
- Re: [html-templates] Typos
Thursday, 3 January 2013
Wednesday, 2 January 2013
- Re: Server-Sent Events contradiction
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: Server-Sent Events contradiction
- [html-templates] Typos
- Affiliation change and Streams API status