Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec

yes, it actually is document related to current document... does not 
seem confusing to me at all,
but I can go with fragment or stub as well :]

B.


On 8.3.2013 22:25, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com> wrote:
>> Agree. Seems like Dimitri and Anne decided that these targets are
>> 'document', did they not?
> rel="document" seems to communicate that the relation of the linked
> resources to the document is "document", which is at least cyclical if
> not totally wrong :)
>
> :DG<

Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 21:29:08 UTC