- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:52:05 +0100
- To: "Pablo Flouret" <pablof@motorola.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Alex Mogilevsky" <alexmog@microsoft.com>
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 02:11:41 +0100, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: > ± From: Pablo Flouret [mailto:pablof@motorola.com] > ± Sent: Monday, February 4, 2013 12:47 PM > ± > ± On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:59:46 -0800, Alex Mogilevsky > <alexmog@microsoft.com> > ± wrote: > ± > ± > There was a discussion here a while ago on desired default behavior > ± > for Enter in contenteditable and options for > ± > execCommand("defaultParagraphSeparator"): > ± > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2011May/thre > ± > ad.html#msg171 > ± > > ± > Did it ever get to consensus? Or is there new thinking on how that > ± > should work? > ± > ± I implemented this in Opera and WebKit[1], can't really tell from the > ± bugzilla bug if it's in firefox too[2], but i think they were on board > as > ± well. > ± > ± [1] https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59961 > ± [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748303 > > I can't find any documentation for any of the implementations, perhaps > you could answer if the following is true: > > * The command name is "defaultParagraphSeparator", unprefixed In Presto, it's "opera-defaultblock" (we implemented it before it was in the spec). > * Argument is case insensitive > * The only available options are "P" and "DIV" > * Default is "P" In Presto, yes. > Is that correct? > > Thanks > Alex -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 09:52:50 UTC