On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com> wrote: > > In our work, we adopt a composition rule that a node knows about it's own > > children and can have expectations of them, but can make no assumptions > > about it's parent or siblings. As a coding model we've found it to be > > deterministic enough to build sane constructions. For example, you can > use > > methods/properties on your children, but should only fire events upward. > Yup. My assumption was that for a custom element, its children matter more than its parent or siblings. > > > Therefore, our polyfills have an invariant that custom elements are > prepared > > bottom-up (i.e. my children are all upgraded before I am). > > Intuitively, I agree with Scott. Which means that the callback queue > is LIFO, right? > Ah right. This sounds simple enough to be explained... and to be implemented :-) > :DG< > -- morrita
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2013 01:06:38 UTC