- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:03:14 -0700
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Cc: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>, Angelina Fabbro <angelinafabbro@gmail.com>, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, Steve Orvell <sorvell@google.com>, seddon.ryan@gmail.com, ladicek@gmail.com, Dominic Cooney <dominicc@google.com>
Hello folks! It seems that we've had a bit of informal feedback on the "Web Components" as the name for the <link rel=component> spec (cc'd some of the "feedbackers"). So... these malcontents are suggesting that "Web Components" is more a of a general name for all the cool things we're inventing, and <link rel=component> should be called something more specific, having to do with enabling modularity and facilitating component dependency management that it actually does. I recognize the problem, but I don't have a good name. And I want to keep moving forward. So let's come up with a good one soon? As outlined in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013JanMar/0742.html Rules: 1) must reflect the intent and convey the meaning. 2) link type and name of the spec must match. 3) no biting. :DG<
Received on Monday, 25 March 2013 19:03:42 UTC