- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:37:23 +0000
- To: Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com> wrote: > 3. Progress events have been clarified. You're still using the old IDL syntax for event handlers. > Specification bugs still exist I think we should rename URI to URL. That's what everyone is converging on. I'm also not convinced that leaving what exactly to return in the HTTP scenario open to implementors is a good thing. We've been through such things before and learned that handwaving is bad. Lets just pick something. Just like HTML, CSS, etc. this specification should defer to http://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/ for its encoding related requirements. I don't think we should throw for limitations on URL length. We always leave undefined lengths unaddressed in specifications, including with regards to how to handle them. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:38:09 UTC