- From: Dominic Cooney <dominicc@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:59:46 +0900
- To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
- Cc: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 06:00:13 UTC
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I'd rather like it if the spec said "the component document is a document >> that's always in standards mode and has no children" and then the contents >> of the component were put into a DocumentFragment. >> > > Should it bother us that depending on the implementation, one document > could be shared among all component fragments or not? > Yes. The spec should be prescriptive on this point. I think that the content property should be DocumentFragment, for consistency with template, and because document has irrelevant API. -- Email SLA <http://goto.google.com/dc-email-sla> • Google+<https://plus.sandbox.google.com/111762620242974506845/posts>
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 06:00:13 UTC