- From: Dominic Cooney <dominicc@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:20:31 +0900
- To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CAHnmYQ8m-Ce_FwSrGFZYqbEKSCJFWkuBFbAAMVkt+wxtniskOA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>wrote: > Hi folks! > > Just had a quick discussion with Elliott and he suggested that instead of > building full-blown Documents, the <link rel="components"> just make > DocumentFragments, just like <template> does. > I am confused by what you are proposing here. Templates "produce" document fragments in the sense that the HTMLTemplateElement's content attribute is a DocumentFragment. On the other hand, templates use full-blown documents in the sense that "the template contents owner is a document which does not have a browsing context." < https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/templates/index.html#definitions > > Looking at > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/dom.html#the-document-object and > the bunch of APIs that will never be useful on a document without a > browsing context, I think it's a pretty good idea. It should make also > components more lightweight. > It you are proposing to make the Component interface's content attribute a DocumentFragment, I think that is OK. It does not make the components any lighter, because component.content.ownerDocument will inevitably point to that other document. Could you provide a more specific proposal? I don't understand what you're proposing here. > The only problem is that now I have to figure out how to specify this > without just flat-out stealing, err... I mean reusing, large swaths of > HTML5 spec. But I'll take this one for the team. > > :DG< > -- Email SLA <http://goto.google.com/dc-email-sla> • Google+<https://plus.sandbox.google.com/111762620242974506845/posts>
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2013 05:21:02 UTC