- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:43:00 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 2/12/13 1:11 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Not given the flattened tree construction algorithm I last saw... Am I just >> missing something? > > Right, because it's not an element yet, and thus can't appear in the > tree like all the other elements do. Once it becomes an element, I > presume it would. I presume it wouldn't; there's no reason for it to. As in, it's equally magic for it to appear and not appear (but its kids appear), as far as I can tell. > Sorry, my mistake. My point is that it won't appear in the box tree. Yes, on that we agree, even if we disagree on the reasons for why it doesn't appear there. ;) -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 13:43:29 UTC