cc John Neumann On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Oliver Hunt <oliver@apple.com> wrote: > JSON is deliberately minimal and deliberately unversioned. > > What are you expecting this working group to do? Also, given that JSON is > essentially a subset of ECMAScript literal syntax, I'm unsure why this > isn't being handled by TC39 > It's more then a subset, it's specified in Ecma-262 Edition 5.1, which is ISO/IEC 16262:2011[0]. Rick [0] http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=55755 > --Oliver > > > On Feb 18, 2013, at 4:19 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > > > * Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote: > >> We're planning on doing a BoF in Orlando to discuss starting up a JSON > >> working group. The BoF is currently planned for Monday afternoon at > 1300 > >> in Carribean 6. A very preliminary version of a charter can be found > here: > >> > >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/appsawg/trac/wiki/JSON > >> > >> But obviously we'll need to build consensus on what it should actually > >> contain. Please discuss on the json@ietf.org mailing list: > >> > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json > > > > (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg08912.html > ) > > -- > > Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > > Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de > > 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 17:40:53 UTC