- From: Jack (Zhan, Hua Ping) <jackiszhp@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:31:54 -0500
- To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "ian@hixie.ch" <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>
Dear Travis, Glad to hear from you. Are you guys do volunteer job for that? or are you get paid for that? If you guys are volunteering there, I have no say about. If you guys do get paid, then please be professional and put things right at the first place. Bad standard wastes internet community's time, energy, and money too. with best regards Jack (Zhan, Hua Ping) +1-647-971-6390 On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote: > Jack, > > With all due respect, this feedback is a little late. The spec in question is now at candidate recommendation, and there are multiple interoperable implementation in existence. While this is not to say that the spec cannot be changed at this point, I would anticipate that many participants in the working group (include myself) would be very hesitant to change their implementations due to existing web compatibility. > > Having said that, I don't believe that the existing design of postMessage is as bad is you make it sound :-) > > -Travis
Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 17:32:20 UTC