- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:20:43 +0100
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- CC: Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 22/01/2013 17:14 , Tobie Langel wrote: > On 1/22/13 4:45 PM, "Robin Berjon" <robin@w3.org> wrote: >> You *do* need to make the proper commitments for the test suite, but >> those are much lighter and can easily be extended to all. > > Moving to GitHub should be an excellent occasion to revisit how the CLA > works and provide better integration, e.g.: by using something like > CLAHub[1]. FYI we're looking at CLAHub as a possible solution for this (either directly or with a few modifications to tie it into our systems). No promises but it's on the table. >> That's why we're proposing to ditch per-WG anything here. The way >> html-testsuite is set up, we already have subdirectories for html, >> canvas2d, and microdata. Those are all from the HTML WG, but they're >> just listed as the individual specs. We can keep on adding more specs in >> there (the Web Crypto people are looking to do that). > > That sounds good to me. It's the per WG siloing I'm opposed to, not the > one repository to rule them all idea. Good! Well, it looks like everyone agrees... If we're forging ahead, I have admin rights to the repo so you know who to prod. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 16:20:49 UTC