Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub

On 22/01/2013 17:14 , Tobie Langel wrote:
> On 1/22/13 4:45 PM, "Robin Berjon" <> wrote:
>> You *do* need to make the proper commitments for the test suite, but
>> those are much lighter and can easily be extended to all.
> Moving to GitHub should be an excellent occasion to revisit how the CLA
> works and provide better integration, e.g.: by using something like
> CLAHub[1].

FYI we're looking at CLAHub as a possible solution for this (either 
directly or with a few modifications to tie it into our systems). No 
promises but it's on the table.

>> That's why we're proposing to ditch per-WG anything here. The way
>> html-testsuite is set up, we already have subdirectories for html,
>> canvas2d, and microdata. Those are all from the HTML WG, but they're
>> just listed as the individual specs. We can keep on adding more specs in
>> there (the Web Crypto people are looking to do that).
> That sounds good to me. It's the per WG siloing I'm opposed to, not the
> one repository to rule them all idea.

Good! Well, it looks like everyone agrees... If we're forging ahead, I 
have admin rights to the repo so you know who to prod.

Robin Berjon - - @robinberjon

Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 16:20:49 UTC