- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:04:09 +0000
- To: "Reitbauer, Alois" <Alois.Reitbauer@compuware.com>
- Cc: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Reitbauer, Alois <Alois.Reitbauer@compuware.com> wrote: > You are right we would not need any progress events and you are also > typically not interested in the response. The server should normally reply > only with a no content reply. Conceptually this reply would not be needed, > however, HTTP requires it. You can think of this type of interaction like > sending an UDP packet. You want it to be send and delivered at best > effort. Are you sometimes interested in the response? Kind of makes a difference. Also, how is this different from http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#ping Especially if we make this a dedicated feature in some way it seems all the same considerations apply and that feature has thus far not been hugely successful. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2013 10:04:41 UTC