- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:45:45 -0400
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
On 3/11/13 5:18 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote: > "inserted" and "removed" can probably be end of micro task, but > attributeChanged definitely needs to be synchronous to model the > behavior of <input type> where changing it from X to Y has an immediate > effect on the APIs available (like stepUp). Hmm. That's a good point. We should rope in Jonas and Olli on this bit. As long as it's ok to call attributeChanged right before the return from the attribute mutator, this seems to be a reasonable thing to me. -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2013 00:46:13 UTC