- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:52:09 +0100
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
On 02/20/2013 08:24 AM, Reitbauer, Alois wrote: > My personal experience is different. We found that using img tags is not > that reliable. Especially in Firefox we recently saw some problems. Img > tags in general have the disadvantage that the amount of data that can > be set is rather limited. While this obviously should be kept as small > as possible, the information available via resource timing will increase > the amount of data that gets sent. > > Is there a way we can integrate this into a W3C test suite to check how > different browsers behave in this case Yes, tests for behaviour around navigation and unload should go in the HTML testsuite[1]. There are some guidelines for writing tests at [2], but they appear in need of an update to reflect the fact that we now use git[hub] rather than mercurial. If you have any questions, please ask, either on the public-html-testsuite list, or in the #whatwg channel on Freenode or on the #testing channel on the W3C IRC server. [1] https://github.com/w3c/html-testsuite/ [2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Testing/Authoring/
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 08:52:38 UTC