- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:25:57 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17681 Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #7 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> --- Reopening. This bug was specifically about specifying order between all exception types. I agree that generally it doesn't matter which exception is thrown, but if we don't think that should be defined, then we should mark this bug WONTFIX rather than FIXED. I do think it would be good to define all exception orders though. One way to do it would be to have a global list that defines some sort of priority based on exception type. So if both a TransactionInactiveError and a ReadOnlyError test is failing, we always throw ReadOnlyError. And if ReadOnlyError and DataError both are possible, then we throw DataError. Or something like that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 16 March 2013 11:25:58 UTC