- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:30:53 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 1/22/13 12:20 PM, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com> wrote: >> There are benefits to both approaches. I would be in favor of having a >> repository per spec (named tr_shortname-testsuite). This will make it a >> lot easier to securely give scoped commit rights to external >>contributors >> when the need arises. > >Given how we relatively frequently move features around and have not >exactly figured out the overall architecture I don't think that's an >approach that scales. That's definitely something to keep in mind. How frequent is it that a feature moves from one spec to another (that, is outside of the continuous flow of features that migrate from HTML5 to WebApps)? Is your concern about history loss? --tobie
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 11:31:34 UTC