- From: Jungkee Song <jungkees@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 00:20:59 +0900
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > >> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Samsung/> > > These are testing XMLHttpRequest. There are no normative criteria in > the Progress Events specification that justify these tests. I agree. It seems that .../submissions/Ms2ger test cases cover all the normative criteria of Progress Events spec. Then, we can adjust the scope of the RfR to Ms2ger's contribution. (I will fix the issue in .../submissions/Samsung anyway.) > (This in > part is why I merged Progress Events into XMLHttpRequest. On its own > it's kinda useless.) I believe Progress Events spec has a meaning as an event interface definition itself as long as it would potentially support multiple use cases (currently XHR and <img> element.) > As for the tests, one is buggy because the PHP gives a 404. I've pushed the php file in <http://dvcs.w3.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Samsung/resources/> but cannot find it at <w3-test.org> mirror. Can anyone help? > Another > one assumes the network is not slow by checking for ev.loaded != 0. Fixed. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webapps/rev/52b745cebe4f Thanks for comments. Jungkee > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > -- ----------------- Jungkee Song Samsung Electronics
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2013 15:21:27 UTC