Re: Beacon API

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Reitbauer, Alois
<> wrote:
> The conversations this week were very helpful in deciding how to move forward. I second Jatinder's idea that we come up with a specification that describes in details what we need. We should also treat it as a separate specification. If we then see that it has enough commonalities with XHR and does not introduce unnecessary complexity we can still merge it.  I also think that this is the most efficient way to move forward here.

It's not entirely clear to me how we moved from "we need a simple flag
on XHR" to lets create a whole new API...


Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 09:19:38 UTC