Re: Updated idlharness.js

On 23/01/2013 19:11 , Glenn Adams wrote:
> were you able to incorporate the improvements I suggested at [1]?
> [1]

Well, it's an entirely different code base, so certainly not as is. But 
at least some of what you describe in there should be supported. (In 
webidl2.js that is, not idlharness.js).

Robin Berjon - - @robinberjon

Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 15:19:27 UTC