- From: Erik Arvidsson <arv@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 07:25:33 -0700
- To: Dominic Cooney <dominicc@google.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
- Message-ID: <CAJ8+GogE95BhtXjboQ9jgXe2NUz4ueDEr1Ro-Juhr=ct5ZJk9g@mail.gmail.com>
Also, how would you resolve URLs. Can I use <base>? On Mar 12, 2013 10:22 PM, "Dominic Cooney" <dominicc@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>wrote: > >> Hi folks! >> >> Just had a quick discussion with Elliott and he suggested that instead of >> building full-blown Documents, the <link rel="components"> just make >> DocumentFragments, just like <template> does. >> > > I am confused by what you are proposing here. > > Templates "produce" document fragments in the sense that the > HTMLTemplateElement's content attribute is a DocumentFragment. > > On the other hand, templates use full-blown documents in the sense that > "the template contents owner is a document which does not have a browsing > context." < > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/templates/index.html#definitions > > > > >> Looking at >> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/dom.html#the-document-object and >> the bunch of APIs that will never be useful on a document without a >> browsing context, I think it's a pretty good idea. It should make also >> components more lightweight. >> > > It you are proposing to make the Component interface's content attribute a > DocumentFragment, I think that is OK. It does not make the components any > lighter, because component.content.ownerDocument will inevitably point to > that other document. > > Could you provide a more specific proposal? I don't understand what you're > proposing here. > > >> The only problem is that now I have to figure out how to specify this >> without just flat-out stealing, err... I mean reusing, large swaths of >> HTML5 spec. But I'll take this one for the team. >> >> :DG< >> > > > > -- > Email SLA <http://goto.google.com/dc-email-sla> • Google+<https://plus.sandbox.google.com/111762620242974506845/posts> >
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2013 14:26:08 UTC