- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:48:07 -0800
- To: Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com>
- Cc: Rick Waldron <waldron.rick@gmail.com>, Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Daniel Buchner <daniel@mozilla.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com> wrote:
> MyButton = document.register(‘x-button’, {
> prototype: MyButton.prototype,
> lifecycle: {
> created: MyButton
> }
> });
>
> What's the benefit of allowing this syntax? I don't immediately see why you
> couldn't just do it the other way.
Daniel answered the direct question, I think, but let me see if I
understand the question hiding behind your question :)
Why can't we just have one API, since these two are so close already?
In other words, can we not just use "constructor" API and return a
generated constructor?
Do I get a cookie? :)
:DG<
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2013 22:48:38 UTC