- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 10:38:42 +0100
- To: "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Ms2ger/> http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Ms2ger/constructor.html is buggy. We changed the default of event.eventPhase a while back. http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Ms2ger/other.html is also buggy. Per DOM document.createEvent() should not work with ProgressEvent. > <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Samsung/> These are testing XMLHttpRequest. There are no normative criteria in the Progress Events specification that justify these tests. (This in part is why I merged Progress Events into XMLHttpRequest. On its own it's kinda useless.) As for the tests, one is buggy because the PHP gives a 404. Another one assumes the network is not slow by checking for ev.loaded != 0. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2013 09:39:10 UTC