- From: Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:18:40 -0500
- To: Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com>
- Cc: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>, Daniel Buchner <daniel@mozilla.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com> wrote: > Sorry, replace MyButton.super() with MyButton.super.call(this); > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com> wrote: >> >> So, neglecting issues around the syntax of document.register and the >> privatization of callbacks, is it fair to say the following is the intended >> future: >> >> class MyButton extends HTMLButtonElement { >> constructor() { >> super(); >> // make root, etc. >> } >> } >> document.register('x-button', MyButton); >> >> If so then can we do this in the present: >> >> MyButtonImpl = function() { What do you mean here? >> MyButton.super(); Did you get that backwards? I don't see how MyButtonImpl can be derived from MyButton. >> // make root, etc. >> }; >> MyButtonImpl.prototype = Object.create(HTMLButtonElement, { ... }); >> >> // the ‘real’ constructor comes from document.register >> // register injects ‘super’ into MyButton >> MyButton = document.register(‘x-button’, MyButtonImpl); What is the relationship between MyButton and MyButtonImpl? If MyButton.__proto__ === MyButtonImpl and MyButton.prototype.__proto__ === MyButtonImpl.prototype then this might work (but this cannot be polyfilled either). -- erik
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:19:28 UTC