On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > Seeing this discussion, and noting two open [Bugz], I was wondering about > the plan to get this spec to a feature complete status (and hence ready for > Last Call Working Draft). Would you please provide a short status/plan for > Pointer Lock spec vis-ā-vis LCWD? > > -Thanks, AB > > [Bugz] <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/buglist.cgi?product=** > WebAppsWG&component=Pointer%**20Lock&resolution=---&list_id=**3760<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WebAppsWG&component=Pointer%20Lock&resolution=---&list_id=3760> > > The discussion about how easily javascript shims can be created is orthogonal to the pointer lock spec. I'll leave that discussion on that thread, which I note has concluded in "pointer lock has apparently already been shimmed". Of the two open issues, one [1] was already resolved (adding allow-pointer-lock to HTML). I've closed the issue. The other [2] is blocked on Mozilla's security review [3]. [1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18647 [2] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19297 [3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=822654
Received on Friday, 4 January 2013 18:05:14 UTC