- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:46:34 -0500
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Last year we agreed to stop work on the "baseline" XHR spec because no
one was willing to work on that version of the spec. Since then, the new
XHR Editors agreed to work on a baseline version as well as to continue
to work on the `bleeding edge` version.
One goal of the baseline version is to specify features that are widely
implemented and deployed today. As such, it _should_ be relatively
straight forward to move this version to LC and then to CR->PR->REC and
thus "finalize" the IP commitments by WebApps' members. (There are no
firm IP commitments for XHR until a REC is published.)
My proposal is to use the "XMLHttpRequest1" shortname for the baseline
version, the same shortname as the XHR WG Note published 17 January 2012
[XHR-Note]. Thus, the first TR publication of the new baseline spec
would "replace" the WG Note (although the dated version of the WG Note
[XHR-Note-Dated] will of course be untouched).
I don't feel strongly about the title of the baseline version. Some
options: "XMLHttpRequest Baseline", "XMLHttpRequest Level {0,1}" and I
could live with something like "XMLHttpRequest: The Attorney's Edition
[v{0,1}]".
Comments?
-Art and Chaals
[XHR-Note] <http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest1/>
[XHR-Note-Dated] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-XMLHttpRequest1-20120117/>
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2013 14:47:06 UTC