RE: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?

± From: Aryeh Gregor [mailto:ayg@aryeh.name]
± Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:59 AM
± 
± On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com> wrote:
± > FWIW, Aryeh is currently studying full time and doesn't follow web
± > standards discussions regularly.
± 
± I do check them from time to time, though, and will check any personal e-mail I
± receive for the time being.  In particular, I'm happy to answer any questions in
± public or private about the spec, particularly to help a new editor get the hang of
± it.  It's giant and complicated and very hard to read -- which I suspect is an
± accurate description of implementations' source code as well!  (At least I've
± heard terrible things about WebKit's implementation, and Gecko's I've seen.  As
± specs get more precise, their complexity eventually matches that of
± implementations . . .)

Thanks for taking time to help here. Your work is a major advance from spec vacuum that we had in the past, it will be very valuable to have your perspective and input as (hopefully) we get to move it forward.

Alex

Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 21:13:37 UTC