Re: Updated idlharness.js

On 24/01/2013 12:21 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> I've run it on the existing test case we have on this for the Battery
> API:
> http://w3c-test.org/dap/battery/tests/submissions/anssik/battery-interface-idlharness.html
> and it gave the same result on the one implementation I know of that API
> (11 passes and 2 fails).

Thanks!

Based on this and other feedback, I've applied the change. We're now 
using webidl2.js by default.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 16:59:58 UTC