W3C home
>
Mailing lists
>
Public
>
w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>
July to September 2001
w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from July to September 2001 by date
1161 messages
:
Starting
Sunday, 1 July 2001 23:31:00 GMT,
Ending
Sunday, 30 September 2001 23:30:46 GMT
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [ date ] [
subject
]
Mail actions
: [
mail a new topic
]
Help
: [
How to use the archives
] [
Search in the archives
]
Monday, 1 October 2001
Suggestion for List Posting
Gregg Vanderheiden
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Re: Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS]
Anne Pemberton
Monday, 1 October 2001
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
Kynn Bartlett
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
Kynn Bartlett
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
Jim Ley
Re: Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS]
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS]
Jim Ley
keep the bandwidth low, but illustrate was: Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
Lisa Seeman
Saturday, 29 September 2001
RE: suggestion for WCAG checklist
Gregg Vanderheiden
Re: suggestion for WCAG checklist
William Loughborough
suggestion for WCAG checklist
Marja-Riitta Koivunen
Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS]
Jonathan Chetwynd
Thursday, 27 September 2001
Does anyone know of any other script wizards?
Jonathan Chetwynd
Friday, 28 September 2001
Re: [Scripts-TECHS] Comments on Script Techniques for WCAG20
Jim Ley
[Scripts-TECHS] Comments on Script Techniques for WCAG20
Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
Jim Ley
Re: NEW CONSENSUS CANDIDATES FOR BIG ISSUES 6,9,10,12
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
Jason White
User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
Lisa Seeman
BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
Gregg Vanderheiden
NEW CONSENSUS CANDIDATES FOR BIG ISSUES 6,9,10,12
Gregg Vanderheiden
Thursday, 27 September 2001
Site rating [was Re: Tone]
William Loughborough
Minutes for 27 September 2001 telecon
Jo Miller
Re: Tone
Anne Pemberton
Re: Tone
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: Tone
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Tone
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Tone
Loretta Guarino Reid
Re: Tone
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: Tone
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Tone
Wendy A Chisholm
Script checker and a techniques document to support it.
Jim Ley
Re: Tone
Anne Pemberton
Re: Tone
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
Jim Ley
Wednesday, 26 September 2001
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
Anne Pemberton
RE: Tone
Charles F. Munat
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
Jim Ley
RE: Tone
Anne Pemberton
RE: Tone
Charles F. Munat
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
Anne Pemberton
Re: Tone
Anne Pemberton
Re: Tone
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Tool to aid with script conformance in pages.
William Loughborough
Tool to aid with script conformance in pages.
Jim Ley
Re: Tone
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
Matt May
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
Jim Ley
Re: Tone
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful
Alan J. Flavell
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what]
Anne Pemberton
Tuesday, 25 September 2001
Re: recommended reading
Anne Pemberton
Wednesday, 26 September 2001
Re: Agenda
Charles McCathieNevile
Agenda
Jason White
Tuesday, 25 September 2001
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful
Sean B. Palmer
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful
Al Gilman
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful
Alan J. Flavell
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [violates: who does what]
Sean B. Palmer
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what]
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful
Sean B. Palmer
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what]
Sean B. Palmer
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful
William Loughborough
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful
Alan J. Flavell
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [violates: who does what]
Al Gilman
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what]
William Loughborough
WCAG 2.0 CP 4.4 Considered Harmful [was: Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1...]
Sean B. Palmer
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what]
William Loughborough
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
Matt May
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what]
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful
Sean B. Palmer
WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what]
Sean B. Palmer
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
Jim Ley
Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
Wendy A Chisholm
[HTML Techs] Re: who does what Re: The Alt/Object Problem [...]
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Jim Ley
Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Matt May
recommended reading
William Loughborough
Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Jim Ley
Re: Tone
Judy Brewer
Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Matt May
Tone
Jonathan Chetwynd
STOP - Re: AccessiBlog updated
Wendy A Chisholm
Monday, 24 September 2001
Re: AccessiBlog updated
Anne Pemberton
Stop this thread [was: Re: AccessiBlog updated]
Judy Brewer
Fw: Why Validate?
Sean B. Palmer
Re: AccessiBlog updated
Matt May
Re: AccessiBlog updated
Kynn Bartlett
Re: AccessiBlog updated
Jonathan Chetwynd
Web site Accessibility Verification software for Microsoft FrontPage
Dana Louise Simberkoff
RE: AccessiBlog updated
Charles F. Munat
RE: [webwatch] Appropriate Alt Text
Al Gilman
RE: AccessiBlog updated
Kynn Bartlett
RE: AccessiBlog updated
Charles F. Munat
Re: AccessiBlog updated
Kynn Bartlett
Re: AccessiBlog updated
Joe Clark
Re: AccessiBlog updated
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: AccessiBlog updated
Anne Pemberton
Re: AccessiBlog updated
seeman
Re: AccessiBlog updated
Joe Clark
Re: alt title and links
seeman
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Iribar Jon
Re: AccessiBlog updated
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES]
Jason White
Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01
Al Gilman
Sunday, 23 September 2001
Re: AccessiBlog updated
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Jim Ley
Re: Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES]
Charles McCathieNevile
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Gregg Vanderheiden
Saturday, 22 September 2001
AccessiBlog updated
Joe Clark
Re: 20 Sept 2001 minutes
Alan J. Flavell
Friday, 21 September 2001
Re: Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES]
Anne Pemberton
Re: Same URI?
Sean B. Palmer
Re: Same URI?
Sean B. Palmer
Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES]
Al Gilman
Re: BIG ISSUES REVISED 9-20-01 (SEE BOTTOM OF NOTE)
William Loughborough
NORMATIVE (was Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01)
William Loughborough
Re: how/what
Anne Pemberton
Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01
Jason White
Re: BIG ISSUES REVISED 9-20-01 (SEE BOTTOM OF NOTE)
Jason White
Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01
Al Gilman
Re: how/what
William Loughborough
Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01
Anne Pemberton
Re: BIG ISSUES
Anne Pemberton
Thursday, 20 September 2001
Re: how/what
Anne Pemberton
CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01
Gregg Vanderheiden
BIG ISSUES REVISED 9-20-01 (SEE BOTTOM OF NOTE)
Gregg Vanderheiden
Re: 20 Sept 2001 minutes
Jim Ley
RE: 20 Sept 2001 minutes
Charles F. Munat
20 Sept 2001 minutes
Wendy A Chisholm
regrets
Matt May
how/what
William Loughborough
Wednesday, 19 September 2001
Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Jonathan Chetwynd
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Jim Ley
Re: BIG ISSUES
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Jonathan Chetwynd
OOPs missed one
Gregg Vanderheiden
STATEMENTS WHERE CONSENSUS WAS NOT REACHED.
Gregg Vanderheiden
CONSENSUS
Gregg Vanderheiden
BIG ISSUES
Gregg Vanderheiden
Issue Elephants, consensus and discussion
Gregg Vanderheiden
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Jim Ley
Re: Agenda
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Al Gilman
Re: K-State example
Al Gilman
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Jim Ley
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jim Ley
Re: Content vs User Agent question
Al Gilman
Agenda
Jason White
Tuesday, 18 September 2001
Content vs User Agent question
Loretta Guarino Reid
[script] K-State example
Al Gilman
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jim Ley
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jim Ley
who does what Re: The Alt/Object Problem [...]
Al Gilman
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jim Ley
The Alt/Object Problem [was: Re: media mix and universal connectedness]
Sean B. Palmer
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: media mix and universal connectedness, plus SENSES and CHOICES
Katie Haritos-Shea
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
Anne Pemberton
Monday, 17 September 2001
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
Anne Pemberton
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
William Loughborough
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
Anne Pemberton
Sunday, 16 September 2001
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
William Loughborough
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
Anne Pemberton
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
Charles McCathieNevile
Saturday, 15 September 2001
media mix and universal connectedness
Al Gilman
Re: sigint-humint was Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
William Loughborough
Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
Anne Pemberton
Are we having fun, yet?
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: sigint-humint was Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
Al Gilman
sigint-humint was Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
William Loughborough
Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
Al Gilman
Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
William Loughborough
definition of accessible: text is convenient
Jonathan Chetwynd
Friday, 14 September 2001
Re: Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
Al Gilman
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
Christopher Atkinson
Friday, 13 July 2001
Connundrum and a Proposal to Address It
Gregg Vanderheiden
Thursday, 13 September 2001
Re: Consensus on Elephants
Al Gilman
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Charles McCathieNevile
Wednesday, 12 September 2001
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jim Ley
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Al Gilman
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Ian B. Jacobs
UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jonathan Chetwynd
GJR's #wai IRC log (11 September 01 / 11:57:22 to 21:39:37)
gregory j. rosmaita
Re: Consensus on Elephants
Anne Pemberton
Tuesday, 11 September 2001
Re: Fwd: minutes, some before lunch, some this afternoon
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Consensus on Elephants
William Loughborough
Re: Consensus on Elephants
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Consensus on Elephants
Al Gilman
Re: Fwd: Re: switch users
Anne Pemberton
Consensus on Elephants
Gregg Vanderheiden
Re: Fwd: Re: switch users
Al Gilman
Re: f2f session is over (8:50pm boston time/5:50pm local time [US Pacific])
Aaron Swartz
Re: the emperor's clothes (or lack thereof)
Al Gilman
Re: Fwd: minutes, some before lunch, some this afternoon
Jason White
Monday, 10 September 2001
Fwd: Re: switch users
Anne Pemberton
Fwd: minutes, some before lunch, some this afternoon
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: the emperor's clothes (or lack thereof)
William Loughborough
irc log for monday morning
Charles McCathieNevile
the emperor's clothes (or lack thereof)
gregory j. rosmaita
Re: On Procedure
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: On Procedure
Jason White
On Procedure
Gregg Vanderheiden
f2f regrets
gregory j. rosmaita
Comments on WCAG 2.0, collated
Wendy A Chisholm
Sunday, 9 September 2001
RE: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
William Loughborough
RE: conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes
Charles F. Munat
RE: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
Charles F. Munat
Re: conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
William Loughborough
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
Al Gilman
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
Jason White
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
William Loughborough
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
Jason White
Re: conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes
Jason White
Saturday, 8 September 2001
conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes
Charles McCathieNevile
no conformance requirements Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
William Loughborough
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
Al Gilman
dyslexia: sources
Al Gilman
Friday, 7 September 2001
two birds with one stone, focus, and organization
Al Gilman
Re: Issues on WCAG 2.0 August 24th draft
Jim Ley
Issues on WCAG 2.0 August 24th draft
Andi Snow-Weaver
Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jim Ley
Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes
Jason White
Structure of deliverables: guidelines and techniques documents
Jason White
Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Charles McCathieNevile
Thursday, 6 September 2001
Minutes from 6 September 2001 WCAG WG
Wendy A Chisholm
regrets for today's call
cyns@opendesign.com
PDF Techniques for WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 Dated Sept 13th, 2001
Katie Haritos-Shea
Re: question about 2.0 formats:
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: Accessibility Testing Lab Software/Hardware
Andi Snow-Weaver
Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 3.)
Jim Ley
Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jonathan Chetwynd
Agenda
Jason White
Wednesday, 5 September 2001
RE: Accessibility Testing Lab Software/Hardware?
Paul Bohman
Accessibility Testing Lab Software/Hardware?
Chiarito-Mazzarella,Jay
Error fixed on agenda for F2F
Wendy A Chisholm
Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Jim Ley
Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 1.)
Jonathan Chetwynd
Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 1.)
Jim Ley
Re: Web user with dementia
William Loughborough
Web user with dementia
Anne Pemberton
Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: WCAG 2.0 Feedback - General
Jonathan Chetwynd
WCAG 2.0 Feedback - General
Graham Oliver
WCAG 2.0 Feedback - Design Principles and the definition of Content
Graham Oliver
Tuesday, 4 September 2001
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Jonathan Chetwynd
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Jason White
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
Sunday, 2 September 2001
Akamai creates a number of streaming applications.....
Jonathan Chetwynd
Saturday, 1 September 2001
Re: akamai
Matt May
akamai
Jonathan Chetwynd
Friday, 31 August 2001
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
William Loughborough
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Jonathan Chetwynd
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
Re: Bandwidth as a constraint
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Bandwidth as a constraint
Anne Pemberton
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
dead-reckoning was Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Jonathan Chetwynd
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
Re: Bandwidth as a constraint
Kynn Bartlett
Bandwidth as a constraint
Charles McCathieNevile
Thursday, 30 August 2001
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
minutes for 30 Aug 2001
Loretta Guarino Reid
RE: Agenda - regrets
cyns@opendesign.com
Agenda - regrets
Jo Miller
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
Wednesday, 29 August 2001
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
Re:Call for Review of the XML Accessibility Guidelines
s.livingstone@btinternet.com
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Loretta Guarino Reid
Re: Agenda - regrets
Paul Bohman
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Jonathan Chetwynd
Call for Review of the XML Accessibility Guidelines
Daniel Dardailler
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
RE: Checkpoint 1.2 clarifications
Charles F. Munat
Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Checkpoint 1.2 clarifications
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: Caption synchronization tolerance
Charles McCathieNevile
Agenda
Jason White
Tuesday, 28 August 2001
RE: Re: Alt keys verses accesskey
gregory j. rosmaita
ACCESSKEY-an actual strength in a perceived weakness
gregory j. rosmaita
Re: alt title and links
gregory j. rosmaita
Re: AccessKeys and what to use [resend with new attachment]
gregory j. rosmaita
Re: AccessKeys and what to use
gregory j. rosmaita
PDF of 24 August 2001 draft
Wendy A Chisholm
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
Re: WCAG 2.0 Comment: What Tells Me To label Input Controls
gregory j. rosmaita
review of:Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 W3C Working Draft 24 August 2001
David Poehlman
RE: Caption synchronization tolerance
Gregg Vanderheiden
understanding vs implementing Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Jonathan Chetwynd
regrets for thursday's call
Wendy A Chisholm
Another update to open issues list
Wendy A Chisholm
Issue tracking: I need your help!
Wendy A Chisholm
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
Checkpoint 1.2 clarifications
Joe Clark
suggested checkpoint title revision:
David Poehlman
question about 2.0 formats:
David Poehlman
Re: Caption synchronization tolerance
Larry Goldberg
Re: Caption synchronization tolerance
geoff freed
Re: Caption synchronization tolerance
geoff freed
Re: Executive Summary
Anne Pemberton
WCAG 2.0 Feedback - Perceived lack of clarity about target audience for Guidelines Document
Graham Oliver
WCAG 2.0 Comment: What Tells Me To label Input Controls
Kelly Ford
RE: Caption synchronization tolerance
Jason White
RE: Caption synchronization tolerance
Charles F. Munat
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Jonathan Chetwynd
a library of visual aids? Re: Cognition Simulation
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Font Sizes - units of measure
Phil Brown
Font Sizes - units of measure
Joe Clark
Caption synchronization tolerance
Joe Clark
Executive Summary
Gregg Vanderheiden
Caption synchronization tolerance
Gregg Vanderheiden
Monday, 27 August 2001
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
Re: Cognition Simulation
Marja-Riitta Koivunen
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Matt May
Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Cognition Simulation
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: semantics in style
Sean B. Palmer
Re: semantics in style
Al Gilman
Re: semantics in style
William Loughborough
Re: eating our own dog food
Charles McCathieNevile
open issues list updated per 23 august telecon discussion
Wendy A Chisholm
semantics in style
Wendy A Chisholm
audio-only covered by 1.2 and 1.1?
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: greek was Cognition Simulation
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Cognition Simulation
Marja-Riitta Koivunen
Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
Sunday, 26 August 2001
Re: The Web in the news
Anne Pemberton
The Web in the news
Charles F. Munat
Re: Cognition Simulation
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Issue #10
Anne Pemberton
Re: Issue #10
Jason White
Saturday, 25 August 2001
Re: Are the guidelines upside down?
Sean B. Palmer
RE: Are the guidelines upside down?
Anne Pemberton
RE: Are the guidelines upside down?
Charles F. Munat
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Charles F. Munat
Re: Are the guidelines upside down?
Anne Pemberton
Re: Are the guidelines upside down?
William Loughborough
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Anne Pemberton
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Charles F. Munat
Are the guidelines upside down?
Charles F. Munat
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Anne Pemberton
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Charles F. Munat
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Charles F. Munat
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Charles F. Munat
Re: Saturday AM lyric
Anne Pemberton
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Kynn Bartlett
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Kynn Bartlett
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Kynn Bartlett
Saturday AM lyric
William Loughborough
RE: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
RE: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
Re: AccessKeys and what to use
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Charles F. Munat
Friday, 24 August 2001
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Paul Bohman
Re: Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
RE: Cognition Simulation
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: Cognition Simulation
Paul Bohman
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Charles F. Munat
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Charles F. Munat
RE: Cognition Simulation
Charles F. Munat
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Paul Bohman
Re: Cognition Simulation
Marti McCuller
Cognition Simulation
Anne Pemberton
RE: Data models?
Al Gilman
RE: Data models?
Charles F. Munat
Re: Data models?
Al Gilman
Re: Data models?
Loretta Guarino Reid
Data models?
Charles F. Munat
Re: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
Charles F. Munat
Re: Caption synchronization tolerance
by way of Wendy A Chisholm
WCAG 2.0 24 August 2001 Public Working Draft
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: [proposal] additional success criterion for WCAG2 CP 1.5
gregory j. rosmaita
Re: Against WCAG 1.0 style priorities->conformance
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Caption synchronization tolerance
Charles McCathieNevile
Against WCAG 1.0 style priorities->conformance
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Caption synchronization tolerance
William Loughborough
Re: Caption synchronization tolerance
geoff freed
Re: Issue #10
Anne Pemberton
Re: Checkpoint views
Sean B. Palmer
Thursday, 23 August 2001
Re: Eating one's own dog food
Anne Pemberton
Caption synchronization tolerance
Joe Clark
Re: Issue #10
Jason White
Re: Checkpoint views
William Loughborough
Re: Issue #10
Matt May
Re: Eating one's own dog food
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Eating one's own dog food
Anne Pemberton
Checkpoint views
Charles F. Munat
RE: In defense of flame wars
Charles F. Munat
Issue #10
Charles F. Munat
Re: Eating one's own dog food
Matt May
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
Sean B. Palmer
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
Marja-Riitta Koivunen
Re: [proposal] additional success criterion for WCAG2 CP 1.5
Al Gilman
23 August 2001 WCAG WG minutes
Wendy A Chisholm
What is the target audience for the guidelines? <eom>
Graham Oliver
Re: Eating one's own dog food
Charles McCathieNevile
[proposal] additional success criterion for WCAG2 CP 1.5
gregory j. rosmaita
Re: Eating one's own dog food
Anne Pemberton
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
Sean B. Palmer
Re: AccessKeys and what to use
Al Gilman
Re: Alt keys verses accesskey
gregory j. rosmaita
Re: Alt keys verses accesskey
gregory j. rosmaita
WCAG 2 issue #1
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: Open issue #55
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Eating one's own dog food
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Eating one's own dog food
Anne Pemberton
Re: Eating one's own dog food
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Eating one's own dog food
Anne Pemberton
RE: Multiple guidelines views (views)
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Eating one's own dog food
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Research
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Research
Scott Luebking
RE: Multiple guidelines views (views)
Gregg Vanderheiden
Research
Gregg Vanderheiden
Eating one's own dog food
William Loughborough
Re: 3.3, what now, what next?
Anne Pemberton
Wednesday, 22 August 2001
Re: Open issue #50
Anne Pemberton
Re: Modularization proposals
Sean B. Palmer
RE: Open issue #55
cyns@opendesign.com
RE: In defense of flame wars
Paul Bohman
RE: Agenda
Charles F. Munat
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
Anne Pemberton
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
William Loughborough
Re: In defense of flame wars
Anne Pemberton
Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users
Anne Pemberton
Re: In defense of flame wars
Kynn Bartlett
In defense of flame wars
Charles F. Munat
updated checkpoint mapping
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
Sean B. Palmer
RE: Agenda
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: Agenda
cyns@opendesign.com
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Issue #10, disability specific information and server side stuff
Al Gilman
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
William Loughborough
Re: Open issue #54
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: Agenda
Al Gilman
Re: Open issue #56
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
Al Gilman
Open issue #56
Paul Bohman
Open issue #50
Paul Bohman
Open issue #50
Paul Bohman
Open issue #55
Paul Bohman
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
Matt May
Open issue #54
Paul Bohman
Open issue 53
Paul Bohman
RE: Agenda
Paul Bohman
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: 3.3, what now, what next?
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Agenda
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users
William Loughborough
Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users
Matt May
WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
Sean B. Palmer
3.3, what now, what next?
Al Gilman
reviews/comments
William Loughborough
Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users
Anne Pemberton
Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users
Anne Pemberton
Agenda
Jason White
Re: Can't We All Just Get Along?
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users
Matt May
Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users
Kynn Bartlett
Monday, 20 August 2001
RE: Can't We All Just Get Along?
Marja-Riitta Koivunen
Tuesday, 21 August 2001
Infamous article now online
Joe Clark
Re: Modularization proposals
Jonathan Chetwynd
RE: Modularization proposals
Charles F. Munat
Re: Modularization proposals
Al Gilman
RE: Guideline 1 examples
Kynn Bartlett
RE: Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0)
Kynn Bartlett
RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
Anne Pemberton
RE: Guideline 1 examples
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0)
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
Anne Pemberton
Re: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
Marc David Johnson
Monday, 20 August 2001
Re: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
Anne Pemberton
Tuesday, 21 August 2001
Modularization proposals
Jason White
RE: Multiple guidelines views (views)
Wendy A Chisholm
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.
Al Gilman
Monday, 20 August 2001
RE: Modularization
Kynn Bartlett
RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
Kynn Bartlett
RE: Modularization
Charles F. Munat
RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
Charles F. Munat
RE: Multiple guidelines views (views)
cyns@opendesign.com
Peace!
William Loughborough
Modularization
Joe Clark
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.
Charles F. Munat
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Multiple guidelines views (views)
Kynn Bartlett
Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
Kynn Bartlett
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.
Kynn Bartlett
Multiple guidelines views (views)
Charles F. Munat
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Anne Pemberton
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Anne Pemberton
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Charles F. Munat
RE: alt title and links
Charles F. Munat
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.
Jonathan Chetwynd
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.
Charles F. Munat
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.
Charles F. Munat
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Charles F. Munat
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Charles F. Munat
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Anne Pemberton
RE: Guideline 1 examples
Kynn Bartlett
RE: Guideline 1 examples
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: alt title and links
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Functional equivalents vs. descriptions
Kynn Bartlett
RE: Guideline 1 examples
Kynn Bartlett
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Kynn Bartlett
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0)
Kynn Bartlett
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Al Gilman
Splitting guidelines
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Gregg Vanderheiden
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Marc David Johnson
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Charles F. Munat
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Charles F. Munat
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Anne Pemberton
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: Can't We All Just Get Along?
Charles F. Munat
A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
Charles F. Munat
RE: Guideline 1 examples
Charles F. Munat
Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0)
Charles F. Munat
Functional equivalents vs. descriptions
Charles F. Munat
RE: alt title and links
Charles F. Munat
Re: the 4 colour theorem, and an alternative to the current list of guidelines.
Kynn Bartlett
the 4 colour theorem, and an alternative to the current list of guidelines.
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Title testing
Kynn Bartlett
Title testing
Joe Clark
Sunday, 19 August 2001
RE: Possible deletion
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Can't We All Just Get Along?
Gregg Vanderheiden
Re: alt title and links
Alan J. Flavell
JAWS, alt, and title (was Re: alt title and links)
Jo Miller
Re: alt title and links
Al Gilman
Re: alt title and links
Alan J. Flavell
Re: alt title and links
Alan J. Flavell
Re: Tech Players Question IAB's Rich Media Guidelines
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Can't We All Just Get Along?
Anne Pemberton
RE: Simplest and clearest...
Kynn Bartlett
RE: Simplest and clearest...
Kynn Bartlett
Can't We All Just Get Along?
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Guideline 1 examples
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Simplest and clearest...
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Simplest and clearest...
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Guideline 1 examples
Charles McCathieNevile
Saturday, 18 August 2001
Re: Guideline 1 examples
Anne Pemberton
RE: Simplest and clearest...
Anne Pemberton
Guideline 1 examples
Charles F. Munat
RE: Simplest and clearest...
Anne Pemberton
RE: Simplest and clearest...
Charles F. Munat
Re: Action item: "default"
Anne Pemberton
Re: Action item: "default"
Matt May
Re: Action item: "default"
Anne Pemberton
Re: Action item: "default"
Matt May
Re: Action item: "default"
Al Gilman
Re: Action item: "default"
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Action item: "default"
Anne Pemberton
Action item: "default"
cyns@opendesign.com
Tech Players Question IAB's Rich Media Guidelines
Joe Clark
RE: Simplest and clearest...
Anne Pemberton
Friday, 17 August 2001
Re: A brief examination of purpose.
Anne Pemberton
RE: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose
Charles F. Munat
A brief examination of purpose.
Charles F. Munat
RE: Simplest and clearest...
Charles F. Munat
Re: alt title and links
Matt May
Re: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose
Anne Pemberton
Re: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose
Jo Miller
alt title and links
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Simplest and clearest...
Anne Pemberton
Fwd: web access - ADA Laws
Anne Pemberton
Re: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose
Anne Pemberton
Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose
Charles F. Munat
Re: Simplest and clearest...
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Simplest and clearest...
Al Gilman
Re: Possible deletion
Al Gilman
Re: Possible deletion
Kynn Bartlett
Simplest and clearest...
Kynn Bartlett
Thursday, 16 August 2001
Re: Possible deletion
Paul Bohman
Re: Wording issues
Anne Pemberton
Possible deletion
Gregg Vanderheiden
8/16 Meeting Minutes
Loretta Guarino Reid
techniques, and a separate checkpoint, for word use
Al Gilman
"Real-time commentary"
Joe Clark
Wording issues
Joe Clark
Attractiveness and v.2
Charles F. Munat
Regrets for today's call
Andi Snow-Weaver
Advocacy in WCAG 2.0
Charles F. Munat
Re: Wording issues
Al Gilman
Re: New draft - 14 August 2001
Jo Miller
le mot juste [was Wording issues]
Jo Miller
Re: Wording issues
Paul Bohman
Re: Wording issues
Paul Bohman
Friday, 17 August 2001
accesskey defaults
seeman
Thursday, 16 August 2001
Re: Wording issues
Anne Pemberton
Re: Wording issues
Al Gilman
Re: Wording issues
Joe Clark
Re: New draft - 14 August 2001
Jo Miller
Re: Wording issues
Jason White
Wednesday, 15 August 2001
Wording issues
Joe Clark
Re: New draft - 14 August 2001
Loretta Guarino Reid
Re: Illustrating example (was Re: New draft - 14 August 2001)
Anne Pemberton
Illustrating example (was Re: New draft - 14 August 2001)
Wendy A Chisholm
RE: New draft - 14 August 2001
Charles F. Munat
Re: New draft - 14 August 2001
Anne Pemberton
Tuesday, 14 August 2001
Alt keys verses accesskey
Daniel Newman
Wednesday, 15 August 2001
New draft - 14 August 2001
Wendy A Chisholm
Tuesday, 14 August 2001
Agenda
Jason White
Further infamy for Joe Clark
Joe Clark
WCAG Usability Testing - update and call for comments
David Sloan
Monday, 13 August 2001
RE: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
Charles McCathieNevile
4.3 - descrambled
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
Gregg Vanderheiden
Sunday, 12 August 2001
RE: add a sentence?
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: add a sentence?
Gregg Vanderheiden
Re: add a sentence?
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Rewrites
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
Charles McCathieNevile
Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
Gregg Vanderheiden
add a sentence?
Gregg Vanderheiden
Re: Rewrites
Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
Re: Multimode expression
Kynn Bartlett
Multimode expression
Joe Clark
Saturday, 11 August 2001
Re: forwarded message from Joe Clark
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Rewrites
Kynn Bartlett
Re: class use (notional vs. blindless grouping)
Sean B. Palmer
Re: class use (notional vs. blindless grouping)
Sean B. Palmer
Re: class use (notional vs. blindless grouping)
Al Gilman
Re: class use (notional vs. blindless grouping)
Sean B. Palmer
Rewrites
Joe Clark
RE: 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Gregg Vanderheiden
class use (notional vs. blindless grouping)
Al Gilman
Re: forwarded message from Joe Clark
Anne Pemberton
forwarded message from Joe Clark
Jason White
Friday, 10 August 2001
Re: 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Al Gilman
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
Anne Pemberton
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Anne Pemberton
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
Matt May
demographic considerations (was Re: Including content modes in 4.1)
gregory j. rosmaita
Re: 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
gregory j. rosmaita
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Wendy A Chisholm
3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Anne Pemberton
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Anne Pemberton
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Jo Miller
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Jo Miller
Re: Paper "Designing for users with cognitive disabilities"
Anne Pemberton
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Anne Pemberton
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Anne Pemberton
Greetings
Charles F. Munat
2.2 - proposal for success criteria
Wendy A Chisholm
9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
Wendy A Chisholm
Thursday, 9 August 2001
last minute regrets
cyns@opendesign.com
Re: Agenda
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Agenda
Wendy A Chisholm
Request to Join
Charles F. Munat
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
Anne Pemberton
Request to Join
Charles F. Munat
WCAG 2.0 Criteria Review For checkpoints up to 2.7
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: 1.4 and ALT text
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: 1.4 and ALT text
Steven Livingstone
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
Marja-Riitta Koivunen
Re: Agenda
Charles McCathieNevile
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
Marja-Riitta Koivunen
Thursday, 9 August 2001
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
Anne Pemberton
Re: RE 1.2-.13
Charles McCathieNevile
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
RE: 1.4 and ALT text
Gregg Vanderheiden
Thursday, 9 August 2001
RE 1.2-.13
Gregg Vanderheiden
Wednesday, 8 August 2001
Agenda
Jason White
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
Paper "Designing for users with cognitive disabilities"
Kynn Bartlett
Thursday, 9 August 2001
Regrets
Katie Haritos-Shea
Update on W3C/WAI mailing lists
Judy Brewer
Re: Agenda
Paul Bohman
Agenda
Jason White
Test...
Wendy A Chisholm
Monday, 6 August 2001
RE: New checkpoint: identifying language
Tim Noonan
F2F logistics
Gregg Vanderheiden
Re: 1.4 and ALT text
Charles McCathieNevile
1.4 and ALT text
Gregg Vanderheiden
Re: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon
Wendy A Chisholm
RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
Anne Pemberton
RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
Joel Sanda
Re: Plug for the insightful blind folks
Anne Pemberton
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
Anne Pemberton
Re: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria (fwd)
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Plug for the insightful blind folks
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Missing 3.4 thread stuff
Anne Pemberton
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
Marja-Riitta Koivunen
Re: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria (fwd)
Charles McCathieNevile
Missing 3.4 thread stuff
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
Anne Pemberton
Plug for the insightful blind folks
Anne Pemberton
RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
Joel Sanda
Re: Criterion
Jason White
RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
Joe Clark
Sunday, 5 August 2001
Fwd: Alertbox: First Rule of Usability? Don't Listen to Users
Scott Luebking
RE: Criterion
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon
Kynn Bartlett
RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Criterion
Kynn Bartlett
RE: Criterion
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Criterion
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Criterion
Jason White
Re: Criterion
Charles McCathieNevile
Saturday, 4 August 2001
RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
Anne Pemberton
RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
Joel Sanda
Criterion
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
Gregg Vanderheiden
Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
Joel Sanda
RE: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
Anne Pemberton
Re: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
Gregg Vanderheiden
Friday, 3 August 2001
RE: New checkpoint: identifying language
Kynn Bartlett
RE: New checkpoint: identifying language
Gregg Vanderheiden
Re: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
Anne Pemberton
Re: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
Anne Pemberton
Re: New checkpoint: identifying language
Anne Pemberton
Re: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
Wendy A Chisholm
New checkpoint: identifying language
Wendy A Chisholm
Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
Wendy A Chisholm
Open issues from 26 July 2001 draft
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: Illustrations for content
Anne Pemberton
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illu
Anne Pemberton
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illu
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illu
Joe Clark
Re: Illustrations for content
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Illustrations for content
Jason White
Thursday, 2 August 2001
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Anne Pemberton
Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon
Wendy A Chisholm
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Joel Sanda
Re: checkpoint 3.4 again.
Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
Illustrations for content
Kynn Bartlett
RE: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)
Anne Pemberton
RE: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)
Joel Sanda
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Joel Sanda
RE: slideshow sites/interfaces [was RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)]
Anne Pemberton
regrets
Matt May
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)
Matt May
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)
Anne Pemberton
RE: feedback on "some things to play with"
Steven Livingstone
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)
Jo Miller
RE: slideshow sites/interfaces [was RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)]
Steven Livingstone
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
Jon Ferraiolo
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Anne Pemberton
probable regrets
Jo Miller
examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
Jon Gunderson
RE: More on 3.4
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: slideshow sites/interfaces [was RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)]
Anne Pemberton
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: More on 3.4
Charles McCathieNevile
3.4 illustration page RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
Charles McCathieNevile
Wednesday, 1 August 2001
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Anne Pemberton
Thursday, 2 August 2001
RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
Gregg Vanderheiden
RE: More on 3.4
Joel Sanda
Re: More on 3.4
gregory j. rosmaita
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Joel Sanda
Re: Combining 1.1 and 3.4
Paul Bohman
slideshow sites/interfaces [was RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)]
gregory j. rosmaita
Re: Combining 1.1 and 3.4
Charles McCathieNevile
definition Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: feedback on "some things to play with"
Charles McCathieNevile
Wednesday, 1 August 2001
Re: More on 3.4
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
Re: Combining 1.1 and 3.4
Paul Bohman
Re: dissenting opinion (was Re: RE: checkpoint 3.4 again)
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: More on 3.4
Matt May
Combining 1.1 and 3.4
Paul Bohman
feedback on "some things to play with"
gregory j. rosmaita
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Joel Sanda
Re: dissenting opinion (was Re: RE: checkpoint 3.4 again)
Anne Pemberton
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
Anne Pemberton
Re: Multimedia
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: More on 3.4
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Joel Sanda
Regrets for Tomorrow...................
Katie Haritos-Shea
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Anne Pemberton
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Joel Sanda
Drafts with CSS to hide sections
Wendy A Chisholm
dissenting opinion (was Re: RE: checkpoint 3.4 again)
gregory j. rosmaita
Multimedia
Steven Livingstone
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
Steven Livingstone
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Anne Pemberton
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Joel Sanda
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Jo Miller
RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
Anne Pemberton
Re: More on 3.4
Wendy A Chisholm
Re: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
Anne Pemberton
More Philosophy Stuff
Kynn Bartlett
Re: More on 3.4
Matt May
Re: More on 3.4
Anne Pemberton
Re: More on 3.4
Anne Pemberton
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
Anne Pemberton
RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
Marja-Riitta Koivunen
Additional comments on 31 July draft.
Tim Noonan
Agenda
Jason White
Suggestion for clearer wording of 2.1 in 31 July draft.
Tim Noonan
Issues arising from 31 July draft
Jason White
Re: Including content modes in 4.1
Charles McCathieNevile
RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Including content modes in 4.1
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Including content modes in 4.1
Joe Clark
Re: More on 3.4
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Including content modes in 4.1
Kynn Bartlett
Gutenberg at HWG
Kynn Bartlett
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
Kynn Bartlett
Re: Proposal: checkpoint 3.4
Kynn Bartlett
Re: More on 3.4
Matt May
Tuesday, 31 July 2001
RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
Anne Pemberton
Re: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
Paul B