w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from July to September 2001: by date

Monday, 1 October 2001
- Suggestion for List Posting Gregg Vanderheiden
Sunday, 30 September 2001
- Re: Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS] Anne Pemberton
Monday, 1 October 2001
- Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED Kynn Bartlett
- Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED Kynn Bartlett
Sunday, 30 September 2001
- Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED Jim Ley
- Re: Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS] Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS] Jim Ley
- keep the bandwidth low, but illustrate was: Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED Lisa Seeman
Saturday, 29 September 2001
- RE: suggestion for WCAG checklist Gregg Vanderheiden
- Re: suggestion for WCAG checklist William Loughborough
- suggestion for WCAG checklist Marja-Riitta Koivunen
- Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS] Jonathan Chetwynd
Thursday, 27 September 2001
- Does anyone know of any other script wizards? Jonathan Chetwynd
Friday, 28 September 2001
- Re: [Scripts-TECHS] Comments on Script Techniques for WCAG20 Jim Ley
- [Scripts-TECHS] Comments on Script Techniques for WCAG20 Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED Jim Ley
- Re: NEW CONSENSUS CANDIDATES FOR BIG ISSUES 6,9,10,12 Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED Jason White
- User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED Lisa Seeman
- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED Gregg Vanderheiden
- NEW CONSENSUS CANDIDATES FOR BIG ISSUES 6,9,10,12 Gregg Vanderheiden
Thursday, 27 September 2001
- Site rating [was Re: Tone] William Loughborough
- Minutes for 27 September 2001 telecon Jo Miller
- Re: Tone Anne Pemberton
- Re: Tone Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: Tone Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Tone Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Tone Loretta Guarino Reid
- Re: Tone Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: Tone Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Tone Wendy A Chisholm
- Script checker and a techniques document to support it. Jim Ley
- Re: Tone Anne Pemberton
- Re: Tone Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>] Jim Ley
Wednesday, 26 September 2001
- Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>] Anne Pemberton
- RE: Tone Charles F. Munat
- Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>] Jim Ley
- RE: Tone Anne Pemberton
- RE: Tone Charles F. Munat
- Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>] Anne Pemberton
- Re: Tone Anne Pemberton
- Re: Tone Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Tool to aid with script conformance in pages. William Loughborough
- Tool to aid with script conformance in pages. Jim Ley
- Re: Tone Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>] Matt May
- Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>] Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>] Jim Ley
- Re: Tone Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful Alan J. Flavell
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what] Anne Pemberton
Tuesday, 25 September 2001
- Re: recommended reading Anne Pemberton
Wednesday, 26 September 2001
- Re: Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
- Agenda Jason White
Tuesday, 25 September 2001
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful Sean B. Palmer
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful Al Gilman
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful Alan J. Flavell
- Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>] Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [violates: who does what] Sean B. Palmer
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what] Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful Sean B. Palmer
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what] Sean B. Palmer
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful William Loughborough
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful Alan J. Flavell
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [violates: who does what] Al Gilman
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what] William Loughborough
- WCAG 2.0 CP 4.4 Considered Harmful [was: Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1...] Sean B. Palmer
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what] William Loughborough
- Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>] Matt May
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what] Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful Sean B. Palmer
- WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what] Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>] Jim Ley
- Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>] Wendy A Chisholm
- [HTML Techs] Re: who does what Re: The Alt/Object Problem [...] Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Jim Ley
- Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Matt May
- recommended reading William Loughborough
- Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Jim Ley
- Re: Tone Judy Brewer
- Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Matt May
- Tone Jonathan Chetwynd
- STOP - Re: AccessiBlog updated Wendy A Chisholm
Monday, 24 September 2001
- Re: AccessiBlog updated Anne Pemberton
- Stop this thread [was: Re: AccessiBlog updated] Judy Brewer
- Fw: Why Validate? Sean B. Palmer
- Re: AccessiBlog updated Matt May
- Re: AccessiBlog updated Kynn Bartlett
- Re: AccessiBlog updated Jonathan Chetwynd
- Web site Accessibility Verification software for Microsoft FrontPage Dana Louise Simberkoff
- RE: AccessiBlog updated Charles F. Munat
- RE: [webwatch] Appropriate Alt Text Al Gilman
- RE: AccessiBlog updated Kynn Bartlett
- RE: AccessiBlog updated Charles F. Munat
- Re: AccessiBlog updated Kynn Bartlett
- Re: AccessiBlog updated Joe Clark
- Re: AccessiBlog updated Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: AccessiBlog updated Anne Pemberton
- Re: AccessiBlog updated seeman
- Re: AccessiBlog updated Joe Clark
- Re: alt title and links seeman
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Iribar Jon
- Re: AccessiBlog updated Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES] Jason White
- Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01 Al Gilman
Sunday, 23 September 2001
- Re: AccessiBlog updated Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Jim Ley
- Re: Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES] Charles McCathieNevile
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Gregg Vanderheiden
Saturday, 22 September 2001
- AccessiBlog updated Joe Clark
- Re: 20 Sept 2001 minutes Alan J. Flavell
Friday, 21 September 2001
- Re: Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES] Anne Pemberton
- Re: Same URI? Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Same URI? Sean B. Palmer
- Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES] Al Gilman
- Re: BIG ISSUES REVISED 9-20-01 (SEE BOTTOM OF NOTE) William Loughborough
- NORMATIVE (was Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01) William Loughborough
- Re: how/what Anne Pemberton
- Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01 Jason White
- Re: BIG ISSUES REVISED 9-20-01 (SEE BOTTOM OF NOTE) Jason White
- Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01 Al Gilman
- Re: how/what William Loughborough
- Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01 Anne Pemberton
- Re: BIG ISSUES Anne Pemberton
Thursday, 20 September 2001
- Re: how/what Anne Pemberton
- CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01 Gregg Vanderheiden
- BIG ISSUES REVISED 9-20-01 (SEE BOTTOM OF NOTE) Gregg Vanderheiden
- Re: 20 Sept 2001 minutes Jim Ley
- RE: 20 Sept 2001 minutes Charles F. Munat
- 20 Sept 2001 minutes Wendy A Chisholm
- regrets Matt May
- how/what William Loughborough
Wednesday, 19 September 2001
- Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Jonathan Chetwynd
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Jim Ley
- Re: BIG ISSUES Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Jonathan Chetwynd
- OOPs missed one Gregg Vanderheiden
- STATEMENTS WHERE CONSENSUS WAS NOT REACHED. Gregg Vanderheiden
- CONSENSUS Gregg Vanderheiden
- BIG ISSUES Gregg Vanderheiden
- Issue Elephants, consensus and discussion Gregg Vanderheiden
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Jim Ley
- Re: Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Al Gilman
- Re: K-State example Al Gilman
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Jim Ley
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jim Ley
- Re: Content vs User Agent question Al Gilman
- Agenda Jason White
Tuesday, 18 September 2001
- Content vs User Agent question Loretta Guarino Reid
- [script] K-State example Al Gilman
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jim Ley
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jim Ley
- who does what Re: The Alt/Object Problem [...] Al Gilman
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jim Ley
- The Alt/Object Problem [was: Re: media mix and universal connectedness] Sean B. Palmer
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: media mix and universal connectedness, plus SENSES and CHOICES Katie Haritos-Shea
- Re: media mix and universal connectedness Anne Pemberton
Monday, 17 September 2001
- Re: media mix and universal connectedness Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: media mix and universal connectedness Anne Pemberton
- Re: media mix and universal connectedness William Loughborough
- Re: media mix and universal connectedness Anne Pemberton
Sunday, 16 September 2001
- Re: media mix and universal connectedness William Loughborough
- Re: media mix and universal connectedness Anne Pemberton
- Re: media mix and universal connectedness Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: media mix and universal connectedness Charles McCathieNevile
Saturday, 15 September 2001
- media mix and universal connectedness Al Gilman
- Re: sigint-humint was Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient William Loughborough
- Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient Anne Pemberton
- Are we having fun, yet? Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: sigint-humint was Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient Al Gilman
- sigint-humint was Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient William Loughborough
- Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient Al Gilman
- Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient William Loughborough
- definition of accessible: text is convenient Jonathan Chetwynd
Friday, 14 September 2001
- Re: Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Al Gilman
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Christopher Atkinson
Friday, 13 July 2001
- Connundrum and a Proposal to Address It Gregg Vanderheiden
Thursday, 13 September 2001
- Re: Consensus on Elephants Al Gilman
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Charles McCathieNevile
Wednesday, 12 September 2001
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jim Ley
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Al Gilman
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Ian B. Jacobs
- UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jonathan Chetwynd
- GJR's #wai IRC log (11 September 01 / 11:57:22 to 21:39:37) gregory j. rosmaita
- Re: Consensus on Elephants Anne Pemberton
Tuesday, 11 September 2001
- Re: Fwd: minutes, some before lunch, some this afternoon Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Consensus on Elephants William Loughborough
- Re: Consensus on Elephants Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Consensus on Elephants Al Gilman
- Re: Fwd: Re: switch users Anne Pemberton
- Consensus on Elephants Gregg Vanderheiden
- Re: Fwd: Re: switch users Al Gilman
- Re: f2f session is over (8:50pm boston time/5:50pm local time [US Pacific]) Aaron Swartz
- Re: the emperor's clothes (or lack thereof) Al Gilman
- Re: Fwd: minutes, some before lunch, some this afternoon Jason White
Monday, 10 September 2001
- Fwd: Re: switch users Anne Pemberton
- Fwd: minutes, some before lunch, some this afternoon Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: the emperor's clothes (or lack thereof) William Loughborough
- irc log for monday morning Charles McCathieNevile
- the emperor's clothes (or lack thereof) gregory j. rosmaita
- Re: On Procedure Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: On Procedure Jason White
- On Procedure Gregg Vanderheiden
- f2f regrets gregory j. rosmaita
- Comments on WCAG 2.0, collated Wendy A Chisholm
Sunday, 9 September 2001
- RE: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good? William Loughborough
- RE: conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes Charles F. Munat
- RE: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good? Charles F. Munat
- Re: conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good? Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good? Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good? William Loughborough
- Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good? Al Gilman
- Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good? Jason White
- Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good? William Loughborough
- Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good? Jason White
- Re: conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes Jason White
Saturday, 8 September 2001
- conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes Charles McCathieNevile
- no conformance requirements Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good? William Loughborough
- Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good? Al Gilman
- dyslexia: sources Al Gilman
Friday, 7 September 2001
- two birds with one stone, focus, and organization Al Gilman
- Re: Issues on WCAG 2.0 August 24th draft Jim Ley
- Issues on WCAG 2.0 August 24th draft Andi Snow-Weaver
- Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jim Ley
- Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes Jason White
- Structure of deliverables: guidelines and techniques documents Jason White
- Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Charles McCathieNevile
Thursday, 6 September 2001
- Minutes from 6 September 2001 WCAG WG Wendy A Chisholm
- regrets for today's call cyns@opendesign.com
- PDF Techniques for WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 Dated Sept 13th, 2001 Katie Haritos-Shea
- Re: question about 2.0 formats: Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: Accessibility Testing Lab Software/Hardware Andi Snow-Weaver
- Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 3.) Jim Ley
- Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jonathan Chetwynd
- Agenda Jason White
Wednesday, 5 September 2001
- RE: Accessibility Testing Lab Software/Hardware? Paul Bohman
- Accessibility Testing Lab Software/Hardware? Chiarito-Mazzarella,Jay
- Error fixed on agenda for F2F Wendy A Chisholm
- Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) Jim Ley
- Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 1.) Jonathan Chetwynd
- Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 1.) Jim Ley
- Re: Web user with dementia William Loughborough
- Web user with dementia Anne Pemberton
- Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: WCAG 2.0 Feedback - General Jonathan Chetwynd
- WCAG 2.0 Feedback - General Graham Oliver
- WCAG 2.0 Feedback - Design Principles and the definition of Content Graham Oliver
Tuesday, 4 September 2001
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Jonathan Chetwynd
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Jason White
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
Sunday, 2 September 2001
- Akamai creates a number of streaming applications..... Jonathan Chetwynd
Saturday, 1 September 2001
- Re: akamai Matt May
- akamai Jonathan Chetwynd
Friday, 31 August 2001
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation William Loughborough
- Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Jonathan Chetwynd
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- Re: Bandwidth as a constraint Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Bandwidth as a constraint Anne Pemberton
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- dead-reckoning was Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Jonathan Chetwynd
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- Re: Bandwidth as a constraint Kynn Bartlett
- Bandwidth as a constraint Charles McCathieNevile
Thursday, 30 August 2001
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- minutes for 30 Aug 2001 Loretta Guarino Reid
- RE: Agenda - regrets cyns@opendesign.com
- Agenda - regrets Jo Miller
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
Wednesday, 29 August 2001
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- Re:Call for Review of the XML Accessibility Guidelines s.livingstone@btinternet.com
- Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Loretta Guarino Reid
- Re: Agenda - regrets Paul Bohman
- Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Jonathan Chetwynd
- Call for Review of the XML Accessibility Guidelines Daniel Dardailler
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- RE: Checkpoint 1.2 clarifications Charles F. Munat
- Re: Cognition Simulation Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Checkpoint 1.2 clarifications Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: Caption synchronization tolerance Charles McCathieNevile
- Agenda Jason White
Tuesday, 28 August 2001
- RE: Re: Alt keys verses accesskey gregory j. rosmaita
- ACCESSKEY-an actual strength in a perceived weakness gregory j. rosmaita
- Re: alt title and links gregory j. rosmaita
- Re: AccessKeys and what to use [resend with new attachment] gregory j. rosmaita
- Re: AccessKeys and what to use gregory j. rosmaita
- PDF of 24 August 2001 draft Wendy A Chisholm
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- Re: WCAG 2.0 Comment: What Tells Me To label Input Controls gregory j. rosmaita
- review of:Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 W3C Working Draft 24 August 2001 David Poehlman
- RE: Caption synchronization tolerance Gregg Vanderheiden
- understanding vs implementing Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Jonathan Chetwynd
- regrets for thursday's call Wendy A Chisholm
- Another update to open issues list Wendy A Chisholm
- Issue tracking: I need your help! Wendy A Chisholm
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- Checkpoint 1.2 clarifications Joe Clark
- suggested checkpoint title revision: David Poehlman
- question about 2.0 formats: David Poehlman
- Re: Caption synchronization tolerance Larry Goldberg
- Re: Caption synchronization tolerance geoff freed
- Re: Caption synchronization tolerance geoff freed
- Re: Executive Summary Anne Pemberton
- WCAG 2.0 Feedback - Perceived lack of clarity about target audience for Guidelines Document Graham Oliver
- WCAG 2.0 Comment: What Tells Me To label Input Controls Kelly Ford
- RE: Caption synchronization tolerance Jason White
- RE: Caption synchronization tolerance Charles F. Munat
- Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Jonathan Chetwynd
- a library of visual aids? Re: Cognition Simulation Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Font Sizes - units of measure Phil Brown
- Font Sizes - units of measure Joe Clark
- Caption synchronization tolerance Joe Clark
- Executive Summary Gregg Vanderheiden
- Caption synchronization tolerance Gregg Vanderheiden
Monday, 27 August 2001
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- Re: Cognition Simulation Marja-Riitta Koivunen
- RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Matt May
- Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Cognition Simulation Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: semantics in style Sean B. Palmer
- Re: semantics in style Al Gilman
- Re: semantics in style William Loughborough
- Re: eating our own dog food Charles McCathieNevile
- open issues list updated per 23 august telecon discussion Wendy A Chisholm
- semantics in style Wendy A Chisholm
- audio-only covered by 1.2 and 1.1? Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: greek was Cognition Simulation Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Cognition Simulation Marja-Riitta Koivunen
- Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
Sunday, 26 August 2001
- Re: The Web in the news Anne Pemberton
- The Web in the news Charles F. Munat
- Re: Cognition Simulation Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Issue #10 Anne Pemberton
- Re: Issue #10 Jason White
Saturday, 25 August 2001
- Re: Are the guidelines upside down? Sean B. Palmer
- RE: Are the guidelines upside down? Anne Pemberton
- RE: Are the guidelines upside down? Charles F. Munat
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Charles F. Munat
- Re: Are the guidelines upside down? Anne Pemberton
- Re: Are the guidelines upside down? William Loughborough
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Anne Pemberton
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Charles F. Munat
- Are the guidelines upside down? Charles F. Munat
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Anne Pemberton
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Charles F. Munat
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Charles F. Munat
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Charles F. Munat
- Re: Saturday AM lyric Anne Pemberton
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Kynn Bartlett
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Kynn Bartlett
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Kynn Bartlett
- Saturday AM lyric William Loughborough
- RE: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- RE: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- Re: AccessKeys and what to use Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Charles F. Munat
Friday, 24 August 2001
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Paul Bohman
- Re: Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- RE: Cognition Simulation Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: Cognition Simulation Paul Bohman
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Charles F. Munat
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Charles F. Munat
- RE: Cognition Simulation Charles F. Munat
- RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Paul Bohman
- Re: Cognition Simulation Marti McCuller
- Cognition Simulation Anne Pemberton
- RE: Data models? Al Gilman
- RE: Data models? Charles F. Munat
- Re: Data models? Al Gilman
- Re: Data models? Loretta Guarino Reid
- Data models? Charles F. Munat
- Re: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0 Charles F. Munat
- Re: Caption synchronization tolerance by way of Wendy A Chisholm
- WCAG 2.0 24 August 2001 Public Working Draft Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: [proposal] additional success criterion for WCAG2 CP 1.5 gregory j. rosmaita
- Re: Against WCAG 1.0 style priorities->conformance Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Caption synchronization tolerance Charles McCathieNevile
- Against WCAG 1.0 style priorities->conformance Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Caption synchronization tolerance William Loughborough
- Re: Caption synchronization tolerance geoff freed
- Re: Issue #10 Anne Pemberton
- Re: Checkpoint views Sean B. Palmer
Thursday, 23 August 2001
- Re: Eating one's own dog food Anne Pemberton
- Caption synchronization tolerance Joe Clark
- Re: Issue #10 Jason White
- Re: Checkpoint views William Loughborough
- Re: Issue #10 Matt May
- Re: Eating one's own dog food Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Eating one's own dog food Anne Pemberton
- Checkpoint views Charles F. Munat
- RE: In defense of flame wars Charles F. Munat
- Issue #10 Charles F. Munat
- Re: Eating one's own dog food Matt May
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful Sean B. Palmer
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful Marja-Riitta Koivunen
- Re: [proposal] additional success criterion for WCAG2 CP 1.5 Al Gilman
- 23 August 2001 WCAG WG minutes Wendy A Chisholm
- What is the target audience for the guidelines? <eom> Graham Oliver
- Re: Eating one's own dog food Charles McCathieNevile
- [proposal] additional success criterion for WCAG2 CP 1.5 gregory j. rosmaita
- Re: Eating one's own dog food Anne Pemberton
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful Sean B. Palmer
- Re: AccessKeys and what to use Al Gilman
- Re: Alt keys verses accesskey gregory j. rosmaita
- Re: Alt keys verses accesskey gregory j. rosmaita
- WCAG 2 issue #1 Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: Open issue #55 Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Eating one's own dog food Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Eating one's own dog food Anne Pemberton
- Re: Eating one's own dog food Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Eating one's own dog food Anne Pemberton
- RE: Multiple guidelines views (views) Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Eating one's own dog food Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Research Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Research Scott Luebking
- RE: Multiple guidelines views (views) Gregg Vanderheiden
- Research Gregg Vanderheiden
- Eating one's own dog food William Loughborough
- Re: 3.3, what now, what next? Anne Pemberton
Wednesday, 22 August 2001
- Re: Open issue #50 Anne Pemberton
- Re: Modularization proposals Sean B. Palmer
- RE: Open issue #55 cyns@opendesign.com
- RE: In defense of flame wars Paul Bohman
- RE: Agenda Charles F. Munat
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful Anne Pemberton
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful William Loughborough
- Re: In defense of flame wars Anne Pemberton
- Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users Anne Pemberton
- Re: In defense of flame wars Kynn Bartlett
- In defense of flame wars Charles F. Munat
- updated checkpoint mapping Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful Sean B. Palmer
- RE: Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: Agenda cyns@opendesign.com
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Issue #10, disability specific information and server side stuff Al Gilman
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful William Loughborough
- Re: Open issue #54 Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: Agenda Al Gilman
- Re: Open issue #56 Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful Al Gilman
- Open issue #56 Paul Bohman
- Open issue #50 Paul Bohman
- Open issue #50 Paul Bohman
- Open issue #55 Paul Bohman
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful Matt May
- Open issue #54 Paul Bohman
- Open issue 53 Paul Bohman
- RE: Agenda Paul Bohman
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: 3.3, what now, what next? Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Agenda Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users William Loughborough
- Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users Matt May
- WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful Sean B. Palmer
- 3.3, what now, what next? Al Gilman
- reviews/comments William Loughborough
- Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users Anne Pemberton
- Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users Anne Pemberton
- Agenda Jason White
- Re: Can't We All Just Get Along? Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users Matt May
- Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users Kynn Bartlett
Monday, 20 August 2001
- RE: Can't We All Just Get Along? Marja-Riitta Koivunen
Tuesday, 21 August 2001
- Infamous article now online Joe Clark
- Re: Modularization proposals Jonathan Chetwynd
- RE: Modularization proposals Charles F. Munat
- Re: Modularization proposals Al Gilman
- RE: Guideline 1 examples Kynn Bartlett
- RE: Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0) Kynn Bartlett
- RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes Anne Pemberton
- RE: Guideline 1 examples Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0) Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes Anne Pemberton
- Re: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes Marc David Johnson
Monday, 20 August 2001
- Re: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes Anne Pemberton
Tuesday, 21 August 2001
- Modularization proposals Jason White
- RE: Multiple guidelines views (views) Wendy A Chisholm
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Al Gilman
Monday, 20 August 2001
- RE: Modularization Kynn Bartlett
- RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes Kynn Bartlett
- RE: Modularization Charles F. Munat
- RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes Charles F. Munat
- RE: Multiple guidelines views (views) cyns@opendesign.com
- Peace! William Loughborough
- Modularization Joe Clark
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Charles F. Munat
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Multiple guidelines views (views) Kynn Bartlett
- Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes Kynn Bartlett
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Kynn Bartlett
- Multiple guidelines views (views) Charles F. Munat
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Anne Pemberton
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Anne Pemberton
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Charles F. Munat
- RE: alt title and links Charles F. Munat
- Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Jonathan Chetwynd
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Charles F. Munat
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Charles F. Munat
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Charles F. Munat
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Charles F. Munat
- Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Anne Pemberton
- RE: Guideline 1 examples Kynn Bartlett
- RE: Guideline 1 examples Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: alt title and links Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Functional equivalents vs. descriptions Kynn Bartlett
- RE: Guideline 1 examples Kynn Bartlett
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Kynn Bartlett
- Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0) Kynn Bartlett
- Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Al Gilman
- Splitting guidelines Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Gregg Vanderheiden
- Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Marc David Johnson
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Charles F. Munat
- RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Charles F. Munat
- Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Anne Pemberton
- Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: Can't We All Just Get Along? Charles F. Munat
- A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious. Charles F. Munat
- RE: Guideline 1 examples Charles F. Munat
- Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0) Charles F. Munat
- Functional equivalents vs. descriptions Charles F. Munat
- RE: alt title and links Charles F. Munat
- Re: the 4 colour theorem, and an alternative to the current list of guidelines. Kynn Bartlett
- the 4 colour theorem, and an alternative to the current list of guidelines. Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Title testing Kynn Bartlett
- Title testing Joe Clark
Sunday, 19 August 2001
- RE: Possible deletion Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Can't We All Just Get Along? Gregg Vanderheiden
- Re: alt title and links Alan J. Flavell
- JAWS, alt, and title (was Re: alt title and links) Jo Miller
- Re: alt title and links Al Gilman
- Re: alt title and links Alan J. Flavell
- Re: alt title and links Alan J. Flavell
- Re: Tech Players Question IAB's Rich Media Guidelines Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Can't We All Just Get Along? Anne Pemberton
- RE: Simplest and clearest... Kynn Bartlett
- RE: Simplest and clearest... Kynn Bartlett
- Can't We All Just Get Along? Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Guideline 1 examples Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Simplest and clearest... Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Simplest and clearest... Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Guideline 1 examples Charles McCathieNevile
Saturday, 18 August 2001
- Re: Guideline 1 examples Anne Pemberton
- RE: Simplest and clearest... Anne Pemberton
- Guideline 1 examples Charles F. Munat
- RE: Simplest and clearest... Anne Pemberton
- RE: Simplest and clearest... Charles F. Munat
- Re: Action item: "default" Anne Pemberton
- Re: Action item: "default" Matt May
- Re: Action item: "default" Anne Pemberton
- Re: Action item: "default" Matt May
- Re: Action item: "default" Al Gilman
- Re: Action item: "default" Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Action item: "default" Anne Pemberton
- Action item: "default" cyns@opendesign.com
- Tech Players Question IAB's Rich Media Guidelines Joe Clark
- RE: Simplest and clearest... Anne Pemberton
Friday, 17 August 2001
- Re: A brief examination of purpose. Anne Pemberton
- RE: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose Charles F. Munat
- A brief examination of purpose. Charles F. Munat
- RE: Simplest and clearest... Charles F. Munat
- Re: alt title and links Matt May
- Re: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose Anne Pemberton
- Re: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose Jo Miller
- alt title and links Jonathan Chetwynd
- Re: Simplest and clearest... Anne Pemberton
- Fwd: web access - ADA Laws Anne Pemberton
- Re: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose Anne Pemberton
- Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose Charles F. Munat
- Re: Simplest and clearest... Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Simplest and clearest... Al Gilman
- Re: Possible deletion Al Gilman
- Re: Possible deletion Kynn Bartlett
- Simplest and clearest... Kynn Bartlett
Thursday, 16 August 2001
- Re: Possible deletion Paul Bohman
- Re: Wording issues Anne Pemberton
- Possible deletion Gregg Vanderheiden
- 8/16 Meeting Minutes Loretta Guarino Reid
- techniques, and a separate checkpoint, for word use Al Gilman
- "Real-time commentary" Joe Clark
- Wording issues Joe Clark
- Attractiveness and v.2 Charles F. Munat
- Regrets for today's call Andi Snow-Weaver
- Advocacy in WCAG 2.0 Charles F. Munat
- Re: Wording issues Al Gilman
- Re: New draft - 14 August 2001 Jo Miller
- le mot juste [was Wording issues] Jo Miller
- Re: Wording issues Paul Bohman
- Re: Wording issues Paul Bohman
Friday, 17 August 2001
- accesskey defaults seeman
Thursday, 16 August 2001
- Re: Wording issues Anne Pemberton
- Re: Wording issues Al Gilman
- Re: Wording issues Joe Clark
- Re: New draft - 14 August 2001 Jo Miller
- Re: Wording issues Jason White
Wednesday, 15 August 2001
- Wording issues Joe Clark
- Re: New draft - 14 August 2001 Loretta Guarino Reid
- Re: Illustrating example (was Re: New draft - 14 August 2001) Anne Pemberton
- Illustrating example (was Re: New draft - 14 August 2001) Wendy A Chisholm
- RE: New draft - 14 August 2001 Charles F. Munat
- Re: New draft - 14 August 2001 Anne Pemberton
Tuesday, 14 August 2001
- Alt keys verses accesskey Daniel Newman
Wednesday, 15 August 2001
- New draft - 14 August 2001 Wendy A Chisholm
Tuesday, 14 August 2001
- Agenda Jason White
- Further infamy for Joe Clark Joe Clark
- WCAG Usability Testing - update and call for comments David Sloan
Monday, 13 August 2001
- RE: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria Charles McCathieNevile
- 4.3 - descrambled Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria Gregg Vanderheiden
Sunday, 12 August 2001
- RE: add a sentence? Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: add a sentence? Gregg Vanderheiden
- Re: add a sentence? Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Rewrites Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria Charles McCathieNevile
- Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria Gregg Vanderheiden
- add a sentence? Gregg Vanderheiden
- Re: Rewrites Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
- Re: Multimode expression Kynn Bartlett
- Multimode expression Joe Clark
Saturday, 11 August 2001
- Re: forwarded message from Joe Clark Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Rewrites Kynn Bartlett
- Re: class use (notional vs. blindless grouping) Sean B. Palmer
- Re: class use (notional vs. blindless grouping) Sean B. Palmer
- Re: class use (notional vs. blindless grouping) Al Gilman
- Re: class use (notional vs. blindless grouping) Sean B. Palmer
- Rewrites Joe Clark
- RE: 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Gregg Vanderheiden
- class use (notional vs. blindless grouping) Al Gilman
- Re: forwarded message from Joe Clark Anne Pemberton
- forwarded message from Joe Clark Jason White
Friday, 10 August 2001
- Re: 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Al Gilman
- Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd) Anne Pemberton
- Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Anne Pemberton
- Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd) Matt May
- demographic considerations (was Re: Including content modes in 4.1) gregory j. rosmaita
- Re: 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes gregory j. rosmaita
- Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Wendy A Chisholm
- 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Anne Pemberton
- Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Anne Pemberton
- Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Jo Miller
- Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Jo Miller
- Re: Paper "Designing for users with cognitive disabilities" Anne Pemberton
- Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Anne Pemberton
- Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Anne Pemberton
- Greetings Charles F. Munat
- 2.2 - proposal for success criteria Wendy A Chisholm
- 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes Wendy A Chisholm
Thursday, 9 August 2001
- last minute regrets cyns@opendesign.com
- Re: Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Agenda Wendy A Chisholm
- Request to Join Charles F. Munat
- Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd) Anne Pemberton
- Request to Join Charles F. Munat
- WCAG 2.0 Criteria Review For checkpoints up to 2.7 Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: 1.4 and ALT text Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: 1.4 and ALT text Steven Livingstone
- Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd) Marja-Riitta Koivunen
- Re: Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
- Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd) Marja-Riitta Koivunen
Thursday, 9 August 2001
- Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd) Anne Pemberton
- Re: RE 1.2-.13 Charles McCathieNevile
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
- RE: 1.4 and ALT text Gregg Vanderheiden
Thursday, 9 August 2001
- RE 1.2-.13 Gregg Vanderheiden
Wednesday, 8 August 2001
- Agenda Jason White
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
- Paper "Designing for users with cognitive disabilities" Kynn Bartlett
Thursday, 9 August 2001
- Regrets Katie Haritos-Shea
- Update on W3C/WAI mailing lists Judy Brewer
- Re: Agenda Paul Bohman
- Agenda Jason White
- Test... Wendy A Chisholm
Monday, 6 August 2001
- RE: New checkpoint: identifying language Tim Noonan
- F2F logistics Gregg Vanderheiden
- Re: 1.4 and ALT text Charles McCathieNevile
- 1.4 and ALT text Gregg Vanderheiden
- Re: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon Wendy A Chisholm
- RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria Anne Pemberton
- RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria Joel Sanda
- Re: Plug for the insightful blind folks Anne Pemberton
- Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd) Anne Pemberton
- Re: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria (fwd) Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Plug for the insightful blind folks Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Missing 3.4 thread stuff Anne Pemberton
- Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd) Marja-Riitta Koivunen
- Re: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile
- Missing 3.4 thread stuff Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria Anne Pemberton
- Plug for the insightful blind folks Anne Pemberton
- RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria Joel Sanda
- Re: Criterion Jason White
- RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria Joe Clark
Sunday, 5 August 2001
- Fwd: Alertbox: First Rule of Usability? Don't Listen to Users Scott Luebking
- RE: Criterion Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon Kynn Bartlett
- RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Criterion Kynn Bartlett
- RE: Criterion Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Criterion Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Criterion Jason White
- Re: Criterion Charles McCathieNevile
Saturday, 4 August 2001
- RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3 Anne Pemberton
- RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria Joel Sanda
- Criterion Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3 Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria Gregg Vanderheiden
- Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria Joel Sanda
- RE: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1 Anne Pemberton
- Re: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3 Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1 Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3 Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3 Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3 Gregg Vanderheiden
Friday, 3 August 2001
- RE: New checkpoint: identifying language Kynn Bartlett
- RE: New checkpoint: identifying language Gregg Vanderheiden
- Re: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1 Anne Pemberton
- Re: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3 Anne Pemberton
- Re: New checkpoint: identifying language Anne Pemberton
- Re: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1 Wendy A Chisholm
- New checkpoint: identifying language Wendy A Chisholm
- Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3 Wendy A Chisholm
- Open issues from 26 July 2001 draft Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: Illustrations for content Anne Pemberton
- Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illu Anne Pemberton
- Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illu Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illu Joe Clark
- Re: Illustrations for content Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Illustrations for content Jason White
Thursday, 2 August 2001
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Anne Pemberton
- Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon Wendy A Chisholm
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Joel Sanda
- Re: checkpoint 3.4 again. Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
- Illustrations for content Kynn Bartlett
- RE: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4) Anne Pemberton
- RE: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4) Joel Sanda
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Joel Sanda
- RE: slideshow sites/interfaces [was RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)] Anne Pemberton
- regrets Matt May
- Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4) Matt May
- Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4) Anne Pemberton
- RE: feedback on "some things to play with" Steven Livingstone
- Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4) Jo Miller
- RE: slideshow sites/interfaces [was RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)] Steven Livingstone
- Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4) Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? Jon Ferraiolo
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Anne Pemberton
- probable regrets Jo Miller
- examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4) Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? Jon Gunderson
- RE: More on 3.4 Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: slideshow sites/interfaces [was RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)] Anne Pemberton
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: More on 3.4 Charles McCathieNevile
- 3.4 illustration page RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001 Charles McCathieNevile
Wednesday, 1 August 2001
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Anne Pemberton
Thursday, 2 August 2001
- RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001 Gregg Vanderheiden
- RE: More on 3.4 Joel Sanda
- Re: More on 3.4 gregory j. rosmaita
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Joel Sanda
- Re: Combining 1.1 and 3.4 Paul Bohman
- slideshow sites/interfaces [was RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)] gregory j. rosmaita
- Re: Combining 1.1 and 3.4 Charles McCathieNevile
- definition Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: feedback on "some things to play with" Charles McCathieNevile
Wednesday, 1 August 2001
- Re: More on 3.4 Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
- Re: Combining 1.1 and 3.4 Paul Bohman
- Re: dissenting opinion (was Re: RE: checkpoint 3.4 again) Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: More on 3.4 Matt May
- Combining 1.1 and 3.4 Paul Bohman
- feedback on "some things to play with" gregory j. rosmaita
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Joel Sanda
- Re: dissenting opinion (was Re: RE: checkpoint 3.4 again) Anne Pemberton
- RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd) Anne Pemberton
- Re: Multimedia Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: More on 3.4 Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Joel Sanda
- Regrets for Tomorrow................... Katie Haritos-Shea
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Anne Pemberton
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Joel Sanda
- Drafts with CSS to hide sections Wendy A Chisholm
- dissenting opinion (was Re: RE: checkpoint 3.4 again) gregory j. rosmaita
- Multimedia Steven Livingstone
- RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd) Steven Livingstone
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Anne Pemberton
- RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Joel Sanda
- Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Jo Miller
- RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001 Anne Pemberton
- Re: More on 3.4 Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001 Anne Pemberton
- More Philosophy Stuff Kynn Bartlett
- Re: More on 3.4 Matt May
- Re: More on 3.4 Anne Pemberton
- Re: More on 3.4 Anne Pemberton
- Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd) Anne Pemberton
- RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001 Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd) Marja-Riitta Koivunen
- Additional comments on 31 July draft. Tim Noonan
- Agenda Jason White
- Suggestion for clearer wording of 2.1 in 31 July draft. Tim Noonan
- Issues arising from 31 July draft Jason White
- Re: Including content modes in 4.1 Charles McCathieNevile
- RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001 Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Including content modes in 4.1 Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Including content modes in 4.1 Joe Clark
- Re: More on 3.4 Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Including content modes in 4.1 Kynn Bartlett
- Gutenberg at HWG Kynn Bartlett
- Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again Kynn Bartlett
- Re: Proposal: checkpoint 3.4 Kynn Bartlett
- Re: More on 3.4 Matt May
Tuesday, 31 July 2001
- RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001 Anne Pemberton
- Re: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001 Paul B

w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from July to September 2001 by date