W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: the Ruler - Rule question

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 11:36:17 -0400
Message-Id: <a05100309b78b2f2f047d@[10.0.1.2]>
To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 11:18 AM -0500 2001/7/29, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>Would we
>a) Put in a rule that says "go as far down that ruler as you can"?
>or
>b) Draw a line on the ruler and say "you must get below that line but
>donít need to go lower -- though it would be good if you did"?
>option (c) --   "you must have content that works for all on the rule"
>doesnít work since the rules must go down to 0 to include all.

(d) State where it is that you lie on the ruler, and have good reasons for
     that decision.

--Kynn

-- 
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Technical Developer Liaison
Reef North America
Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network
Tel +1 949-567-7006
________________________________________
BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL.
________________________________________
http://www.reef.com
Received on Monday, 30 July 2001 12:31:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:11 GMT