W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: the Ruler - Rule question

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 16:50:41 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010730164951.009ff590@pop.erols.com>
To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Greg,

         If I may, I'd like to change my choice of B, to D.... I like that 
option so much better than drawing a single line everyone has to hop to ...

                                         Anne


At 11:36 AM 7/30/01 -0400, Kynn Bartlett wrote:
>At 11:18 AM -0500 2001/7/29, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>>Would we
>>a) Put in a rule that says "go as far down that ruler as you can"?
>>or
>>b) Draw a line on the ruler and say "you must get below that line but
>>donít need to go lower -- though it would be good if you did"?
>>option (c) --   "you must have content that works for all on the rule"
>>doesnít work since the rules must go down to 0 to include all.
>
>(d) State where it is that you lie on the ruler, and have good reasons for
>     that decision.
>
>--Kynn
>
>--
>Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
>Technical Developer Liaison
>Reef North America
>Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network
>Tel +1 949-567-7006
>________________________________________
>BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL.
>________________________________________
>http://www.reef.com

Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com

http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Monday, 30 July 2001 16:55:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:11 GMT