W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

RE: Java scripts

From: Steven Livingstone <stv_es@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 16:39:06 -0700
To: <cyns@opendesign.com>, <seeman@netvision.net.il>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000e01c11a19$fd2a0aa0$0157a8c0@dev.citix.com>
Can I ask what work (other than the WACG 1.0) can been done with respect
to scripts? I can help out here as I have a lot of experience in this


Steven Livingstone,
Author Pro XML 2e and others.

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of cyns@opendesign.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 12:26 PM
To: seeman@netvision.net.il; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: Java scripts

I think it's still an open issue.

-----Original Message-----
From: seeman [mailto:seeman@netvision.net.il]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 8:12 PM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Java scripts

Where are we standing on javascripts. Did we resolve the baseline
capabilities to assume that if the scipt themselves do not present an
accesibilty problem then they are ok (like client - side cookies).
WCAG 1, states " Ensure that pages are usable when scripts, applets, or
other programmatic objects are turned off or not supported "

Are we still holding with that?
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 16:39:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:38 UTC