W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

RE: Agenda

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 16:09:54 -0400 (EDT)
To: <cyns@opendesign.com>
cc: <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108221608370.10111-100000@tux.w3.org>
I agree. Something that worked well in the AU working group was to first put
up issues that had  a proposed resolution for instant consensus. If anyone
objected to the resolution it went back on the table for the agenda, but that
way we got rid of a number of issues quite fast, and could concentrate on
what was more difficult.



On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 cyns@opendesign.com wrote:

  I'd like to propose a 4th option:

  Address the easy questions first, and check them off the to-do list.  Then,
  address the complex and controversial ones, and get through as many as we
  can in the allotted time.

  I suspect that we'll be more motivated to close the difficult issues if we
  know that they are all that stands between us and publication, rather than
  having a bunch of other work still to do once they're closed.
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2001 16:09:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:38 UTC