Re: Eating one's own dog food

Yes, it  was put forward aws a reason why the checkpoint was impossible. So I
went to a little bit of effort to actually demonstrate that it could be done,
and generated some non-text content to go with it. I updated the exmaple page
a bit to incude how the checkpoint might appear:

http://www.w3.org/2001/08/mmcmn/

I would like to do something better with the image, so it is clear that the
unillustrated version is not being recommended. But for that matter I would
like  to have a better image or two. The one there is what I came up with in
about an hour (which after all is a lot less time than I have put into the
text of the checkpoint, and as my original note pointed out I could have used
existing clip art if I had the appropriate software licenses, which many
people do).

Chaals

On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, William Loughborough wrote:

  Does anyone else find it bizarre that

  "Checkpoint 3.4: Supplement text with non-text content" is not
  "supplemented with non-text content" although "Checkpoint
  3.5 Annotate complex, abbreviated, or unfamiliar information with summaries
  and definitions" is annotated with definitions?
[snip]
  "Do as we have done, not just as we say" should
  rule. IMO.