W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: DTD for techniques documents

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:03:18 -0400 (EDT)
To: Matt May <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>
cc: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107051801230.32701-100000@tux.w3.org>
In looking at the earl work we talked about the project for describing such a
language, and decided that it was really a seperate project, albeit related.
So at some point we should attempt this (there is a bunch of demand for it
out there) and we should be able to cleanly integrate it into existing
systems, but I still think it is essentially its own piece of work (and
fairly complex at that).



On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Matt May wrote:

  Your AERT document was pretty much the reason for the rule element. I think
  it needs to be expanded to be machine-readable, though there are going to be
  areas ("write clearly and simply") where no machine-readable rules exist.

 as a response to
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Chris Ridpath" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>

  > The language that describes the rule needs to be precise and I'm wondering
  > if it should be marked-up as well.
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 18:03:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:38 UTC