W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what]

From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:39:15 +0100
Message-ID: <002001c145f9$c29989e0$d98c7bd5@btopenworld.com>
To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "William Loughborough" <love26@gorge.net>
Cc: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
William wrote:
....Jonathan's students can get there from here if/when possible ....
that's fine
Please bear in mind that it is also important that everyone feels they are
part of the authoring process, (isn't that part of what a democracy is?)
obviously my students currently experience an extremely mediated version of
this.
I am extremely nervous that the brite sparks see the benefits of xml for
large publishers (as do I), but do they see that this alienates the rest of
us, because it does.

references possibly include:
-    'on being the right size' (see svg) JBS Haldane
-    It is as if a hurricane, blowing though a junkyard, had the good
fortune to assemble a Boeing 747. F.Hoyle
-    anything concerned with the development of the eye, or the Cambrian era
by SJ Gould


jonathan chetwynd
IT teacher (LDD)
j.chetwynd@btinternet.com
http://www.peepo.com         "The first and still the best picture directory
on the web"
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 16:06:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:14 GMT