W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:45:25 -0400
Message-Id: <a05100311b7863820b926@[192.168.0.142]>
To: "gregory j. rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org
At 3:13 PM -0400 2001/7/26, gregory j. rosmaita wrote:
>aloha, anne!
>thanks for playing in my sandbox!  four questions:
>1. is "RADAR" an acronym?  if so, do you know what it stands for?
>2. what is "AAMR"?

You'd have to ask the author this -- third party viewer's intent is
less valuable than author's!

>3. what is the foreground color/color of the text?  is it green as well?
>(that seems to be the motif)

Red.

>4. is the font used a serif or sans-serif font?

Serif, maybe something like Times New Roman.  Is that important?

>i suppose that no one who approaches the graphic with a tabula rasa would
>know the answers to the first 2 questions, which indicates to me that this
>particular graphic isn't a very successful conduit of information...

Not necessarily, it depends on (a) what it's meant to do, and (b) how
it is used.  Let's not assume that looking at a graphic in a background
can tell us anything about how useful it is!!

>oh, one more question:
>5. would you follow this link out of the blue?  if so, why?

If I was looking for RADAR at AAMR, then sure.

>i'm not sure i would if the alt text just said: "RADAR @ AAMR", which
>appears to be the literal textual equivalent for the graphic...  still,
>there is a checkpoint in WCAG1 (checkpoint 4.2) which recommends providing
>an expansion for acronyms and abbreviations where they first occur...

This is an effect of a broken spec for the <img> tag.  Currently
you can only do this:

      <img alt="RADAR @ AAMR" />

...or an expansion of the same.

But ideally you should be able to do:

     <img>
       <abbr>RADAR</abbr>
       <abbr>@</abbr>
       <abbr>AAMR</abbr>
     </img>

The problem is that <img> is an empty tag when really it should be like
<object>.

--Kynn

-- 
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Technical Developer Liaison
Reef North America
Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network
Tel +1 949-567-7006
________________________________________
BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL.
________________________________________
http://www.reef.com
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2001 17:54:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:11 GMT