W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Open issue #54

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:03:54 -0400 (EDT)
To: Paul Bohman <paulb@cpd2.usu.edu>
cc: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>, Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108221503250.10111-100000@tux.w3.org>
I agree with Paul. If we can't summarise it in one page we should start
summarising again.

Chaals

On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Paul Bohman wrote:


  Open issue #54:

  <quote>
  How long should we make the Executive Summary? Gregg says 2 pages.
  </quote>

  I am still of the opinion that it should be as short as possible. Two pages
  seems at least one page too long to me.


  Paul Bohman
  Technology Coordinator
  WebAIM (Web Accessibility in Mind)
  www.webaim.org
  Utah State University
  www.usu.edu


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2001 15:03:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:12 GMT