At 10:17 AM 8/4/2001 , Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: >I'm working on the success criterion for the guidelines. What's the difference between these success criteria, and a conformance plan? This looks very similar to something I proposed back in September, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2000JulSep/0586.html which basically was a conformance scheme. The main points were: (1) Compliance with _all_ checkpoints is a requirement. (2) Each checkpoint has compliance requirements (technology- specific). (3) Each specific technique was listed as "fully compliant", "minimally compliant", or "partially compliant" (this technique complies if you also do <x> <y> and <z>). The proposal was basically a strawman to generate discussion (I am not sure I fully agree with it, or even did back then), but I think that our "success criteria" discussion is very tied in with any future "compliance scheme" we will create, and we also need to address the question of how the "technology-specific" model of techniques fits in with our "success criteria." --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network Tel +1 949-567-7006 ________________________________________ BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ________________________________________ http://www.reef.comReceived on Sunday, 5 August 2001 11:29:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:11 GMT