W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: On Procedure

From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 09:00:07 +0100
Message-ID: <003401c139ce$9ba96260$e4917bd5@btopenworld.com>
To: <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: "GLWAI Guidelines WG \(GL - WAI Guidelines WG\)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Does Gregg and Jason's approach makes sense, even though it is logical?

The fact is that to construct a piece of art, one does not go through this
process.
Not everything is codified yet, and the reductionist approach does not suit
all goals.
We have no satisfactory way to describe a tree (say) via this route.
It works, but other ways work at least as well.

It really is time for an 'as well as' consideration.

jonathan chetwynd
IT teacher (LDD)
j.chetwynd@btinternet.com
http://www.peepo.com         "The first and still the best picture directory
on the web"
Received on Monday, 10 September 2001 04:26:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:12 GMT