w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from July to September 2001 by subject

!important

"Auditory" descriptions

"Fixed" Print Versions (was: wichita state's usability resources)

"Real-time commentary"

"Request to Join"

1.4 and ALT text

19 July 2001 - WCAG WG Telecon

2.2 - proposal for success criteria

20 Sept 2001 minutes

23 August 2001 WCAG WG minutes

3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes

3.3, what now, what next?

3.4 illustration page RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001

4.3 - descrambled

8/16 Meeting Minutes

9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes

[CSS-TECHS]

[CSS-TECHS] goals and audience of this document

[CSS-TECHS] system colors

[HTML Techs] Re: who does what Re: The Alt/Object Problem [...]

[proposal] additional success criterion for WCAG2 CP 1.5

[script] K-State example

[Scripts-TECHS] Comments on Script Techniques for WCAG20

[w3c-wai-gl] <none>

[webwatch] Appropriate Alt Text

A brief examination of purpose.

a library of visual aids? Re: Cognition Simulation

A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.

A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.

Accessibility Testing Lab Software/Hardware

Accessibility Testing Lab Software/Hardware?

AccessiBlog updated

accesskey defaults

ACCESSKEY-an actual strength in a perceived weakness

AccessKeys and what to use

AccessKeys and what to use [resend with new attachment]

Action item: "default"

Action Paul: adding a sentence to the intro

add a sentence?

Additional agenda item

Additional comments on 31 July draft.

Advocacy in WCAG 2.0

Against WCAG 1.0 style priorities->conformance

Agenda

Agenda - regrets

akamai

Akamai creates a number of streaming applications.....

Alt keys verses accesskey

alt title and links

an action item :)

Another update to open issues list

Are the guidelines upside down?

Are we having fun, yet?

Aside on Fonts: was: RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)

Attractiveness and v.2

audio-only covered by 1.2 and 1.1?

Bandwidth as a constraint

BIG ISSUES

BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED

BIG ISSUES REVISED 9-20-01 (SEE BOTTOM OF NOTE)

Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none

Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]

Call for Review of the XML Accessibility Guidelines

Can't We All Just Get Along?

Caption synchronization tolerance

Checkpoint 1.2 clarifications

Checkpoint 3.4 again

checkpoint 3.4 again.

Checkpoint views

class use (notional vs. blindless grouping)

Cognition Simulation

Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3

Combining 1.1 and 3.4

Comments on SUFFICIENCY for tomorrows COnf Call

Comments on WCAG 2.0, collated

conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes

Connundrum and a Proposal to Address It

CONSENSUS

Consensus on Elephants

CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01

Content vs User Agent question

Criterion

Data models?

dead-reckoning was Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation

definition of accessible: text is convenient

definition Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again

demographic considerations (was Re: Including content modes in 4.1)

Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0

dissenting opinion (was Re: RE: checkpoint 3.4 again)

Document structure

Does anyone know of any other script wizards?

Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS]

Drafts with CSS to hide sections

DTD for techniques documents

dyslexia: sources

Eating one's own dog food

eating our own dog food

Error fixed on agenda for F2F

examples of a variety of sites that include illu

examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)

Executive Summary

F2F logistics

F2F meeting in Melbourne

f2f regrets

f2f session is over (8:50pm boston time/5:50pm local time [US Pacific])

feedback on "some things to play with"

Font Sizes - units of measure

Format for addressing grade-level content........

forwarded message from Joe Clark

fun: photos and participants

Functional equivalents vs. descriptions

Further infamy for Joe Clark

Fwd: Alertbox: First Rule of Usability? Don't Listen to Users

Fwd: minutes, some before lunch, some this afternoon

Fwd: Re: switch users

Fwd: web access - ADA Laws

GJR's #wai IRC log (11 September 01 / 11:57:22 to 21:39:37)

greek was Cognition Simulation

Greetings

Guideline 1 examples

Guideline 10.5 and Table Cells (fwd)

guideline 7.1 about screen flickering

guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)

Gutenberg at HWG

Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users

how/what

HTML minutes 26-07-2001 Teleconference (FINALLY)

HTML Minutes for July 5, 2001

HTML Minutes for Today July 12, 2001

Illustrating example (was Re: New draft - 14 August 2001)

Illustrations for content

In defense of flame wars

Including content modes in 4.1

Infamous article now online

International Accessibility

IRC

irc log for monday morning

IRC reminder - on during today's telecon

Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?

Issue #10

Issue #10, disability specific information and server side stuff

Issue Elephants, consensus and discussion

Issue tracking: I need your help!

Issues arising from 31 July draft

Issues on WCAG 2.0 August 24th draft

Java scripts

JAWS, alt, and title (was Re: alt title and links)

K-State example

keep the bandwidth low, but illustrate was: Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED

last minute regrets

le mot juste [was Wording issues]

linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria

linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria (fwd)

List etiquette

Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation

media mix and universal connectedness

media mix and universal connectedness, plus SENSES and CHOICES

Minutes for 27 September 2001 telecon

minutes for 30 Aug 2001

Minutes for July 5, 2001 conference call

Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon

minutes from 20 june 2001 GL f2f

Minutes from 6 September 2001 WCAG WG

Missing 3.4 thread stuff

Modularization

Modularization proposals

More on 3.4

More Philosophy Stuff

Multimedia

multimedia breakout notes (20 june 2001/GL f2f)

Multimode expression

Multiple guidelines views (views)

New checkpoint: identifying language

NEW CONSENSUS CANDIDATES FOR BIG ISSUES 6,9,10,12

New CSS Techniques draft

New draft - 14 August 2001

NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001

NEW DRAFT NEW DRAFT NEW DRAFT

New Member

no conformance requirements Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes

NORMATIVE (was Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01)

Notes and relevant threads to the baseline capabilities/user agents clause discussion

On Procedure

OOPs missed one

Open issue #50

Open issue #54

Open issue #55

Open issue #56

Open issue 53

Open issues from 26 July 2001 draft

open issues list updated per 23 august telecon discussion

Paper "Designing for users with cognitive disabilities"

pdf and 508

PDF of 24 August 2001 draft

PDF Techniques and Adobe products

PDF Techniques for WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 Dated Sept 13th, 2001

Peace!

Philosophy of WCAG (thanks Matt)

Philosophy of WCAG Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)

Philosophy Re: More on 3.4

photos and participants

photos of the meeting

Plug for the insightful blind folks

Possible deletion

probable regrets

Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1

Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria

Proposal: checkpoint 3.4

Proposal: sufficiency criteria for WCAG 2.0

Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes

Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria

question about 2.0 formats:

raw minutes: final afternoon session of GL f2f, 21 june 2001

RE 1.2-.13

RE Checkpoint 3.4 again

recommended reading

References and contact (was: RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd))

regrets

Regrets and Action Item

regrets for thursday's call

regrets for Thursday's telecon

regrets for today's call

Regrets for Tomorrow...................

Reminder of action items from last few meetings

Request to Join

Research

Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 1.)

Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)

Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 3.)

review of:Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 W3C Working Draft 24 August 2001

reviews/comments

Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose

Rewrites

Same URI?

Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES]

Saturday AM lyric

Script checker and a techniques document to support it.

Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

Semantic pragmatic

semantics in style

Sentence about "uiniversal aspect"

sigint-humint was Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient

Simplest and clearest...

Site rating [was Re: Tone]

slideshow sites/interfaces [was RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)]

Sounds and checkpoint 11.1

Splitting guidelines

STATEMENTS WHERE CONSENSUS WAS NOT REACHED.

STOP - Re: AccessiBlog updated

Stop this thread [was: Re: AccessiBlog updated]

Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?

Structure of deliverables: guidelines and techniques documents

style reflects affinity grouping beyond what's in an element type

Sufficiency/checkpoint satisfaction criteria (repost of last week's draft)

suggested checkpoint title revision:

Suggestion for clearer wording of 2.1 in 31 July draft.

Suggestion for List Posting

suggestion for WCAG checklist

Tech Players Question IAB's Rich Media Guidelines

techniques, and a separate checkpoint, for word use

Test...

the 4 colour theorem, and an alternative to the current list of guidelines.

The Alt/Object Problem [was: Re: media mix and universal connectedness]

the emperor's clothes (or lack thereof)

the Ruler - Rule question

The Web in the news

Timeline: July through November

Title testing

Tone

Tool to aid with script conformance in pages.

two birds with one stone, focus, and organization

UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)

UAAG's content-type, output modality, & selection labels

understanding vs implementing Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation

Update on W3C/WAI mailing lists

updated checkpoint mapping

User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED

Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes

WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful

WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [violates: who does what]

WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what]

WCAG 2 issue #1

WCAG 2.0 24 August 2001 Public Working Draft

WCAG 2.0 Comment: What Tells Me To label Input Controls

WCAG 2.0 CP 4.4 Considered Harmful [was: Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1...]

WCAG 2.0 Criteria Review For checkpoints up to 2.7

WCAG 2.0 Feedback - Design Principles and the definition of Content

WCAG 2.0 Feedback - General

WCAG 2.0 Feedback - Perceived lack of clarity about target audience for Guidelines Document

WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful

WCAG Usability Testing - update and call for comments

Web site Accessibility Verification software for Microsoft FrontPage

Web user with dementia

What is the target audience for the guidelines? <eom>

who does what Re: The Alt/Object Problem [...]

Who would be able to attend a F2F in Melbourne

Who would be able to attend a F2F in Melbourne, Australia - 12-15 November 2001?

Why Validate?

Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0)

wichita state's usability resources (Re: Aside on Fonts)

William Retiring

William's Semantic Web Primer

Winners of ICAES 2001 International Access Engineering Awards Announced & WAVE

Wording issues

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2001 23:30:46 UTC